Teams

Mendoza/Memphis

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 3.0 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Melinda Boudreau
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Angela Melton
published 3
2.93
Linda Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Cheryl Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
2.91
Debbie Pacheco
published 3.5
2.86
Salina Xu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Xiaoqun Akers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Ellen Skinner
published
2.68
Roz Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marnie Stewart
published
Trish Kennedy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Skinner + Christine Mendoza2553% games+9.2% vs expected
Salina Xu + Xiaoqun Akers4746% games−0.7% vs expected
Angela Melton + Linda Bryan4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda Boudreau
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Angela Melton
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Linda Bryan
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Cheryl Murphy
40W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Christine Mendoza
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3.5
Debbie Pacheco
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
Salina Xu
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Xiaoqun Akers
18W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Ellen Skinner
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Roz Wallace
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Marnie Stewart
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trish Kennedy
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.