Teams

Ivory Ridge-Broadbent

2021 Winter League-Weekday · 2.5W AM

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesJill Broadbent / Deborah DeBoer vs MARILYN PETERSEN / Carrie Harris6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-03-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Broadbent / Nancy Evensen vs Linda Judy / Jessica Larson7-5, 5-4
2021-03-01vs Ogden-ComptonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Broadbent / Mindy Black vs Kate Dickman / Kelti Palmer0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMikaela Bills vs Nicole Compton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCara Larson / Nancy Evensen vs Jessica Kilgore / Sally Cantwell2-6, 0-6
2021-02-22vs Rocky Mtn Tennis-Sakar/TurnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJasmine Byers / Cara Larson vs Lexie Sakar / Corinne Wudel4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-08vs Red Ledges-WoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Broadbent / Mindy Black vs Elisabeth Jones / Stefanie Maddox3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCara Larson vs Giuliana Willis1-6, 0-6
2021-02-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesMikaela Bills / Miriam Moore vs Brooke Rollins / Shawna Smart6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCara Larson / Kelly Chipman vs Tina Thatcher / Lisa Cloward6-3, 6-3
2021-01-25vs Rocky Mtn Tennis-Petersen/CaldwellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Broadbent / Mindy Black vs MARILYN PETERSEN / Sandra Chamberlain0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMikaela Bills / Nancy Evensen vs Carrie Harris / Sherrie Hill6-1, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Miriam Moore
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.55
Jill Broadbent
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.30
Cara Larson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Deborah DeBoer
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Mikaela Bills
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mindy Black
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Black + Miriam Moore7750% games+5.5% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Mikaela Bills6752% games−5.0% vs expected
Jill Broadbent + Mindy Black0525% gamesnot enough data
Deborah DeBoer + Cara Larson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miriam Moore
57W–44L career · 9 lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.17
3
Jill Broadbent
68W–93L career · 5 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
2.55
2.5
Cara Larson
36W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Deborah DeBoer
33W–45L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mikaela Bills
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mindy Black
36W–57L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.