Teams

Kjos-Fantastic Four(Hands)

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Ericka Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-08-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Teresa Darling vs Nicola Ash / Jane Paulsen6-1, 6-3
2022-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Rebecca Griffith vs Tiffany Bowie / Valerie Neill6-3, 6-2
2022-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Rebecca Griffith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Teresa Darling vs Jennifer Johnson / Leslie Sampson6-3, 6-3
2022-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Becky Nelson vs Maya Mori / Nina Hanson6-1, 6-2
2022-07-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Heidi Palena vs Christina Melander / Audrey Weil6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Griffith / Ericka Nelson vs Sarie Crothers / Kathy Cooke6-2, 6-3
2022-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Teresa Darling vs Amy Hicks / Mary Jane Toolson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3.5
Ericka Nelson
43W–59L career
17%83%0%
3.08
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.