Teams

SBrock/Traudt (Queens)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-06vs DCastain (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Sharp / Ryan Traudt vs Dawn Castain / Yvette Gama6-1, 6-3
2022-09-29vs AHitchins/KShaeffer (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAustin Taylor / Candace Azad vs Amber Brannon / Katy Walters2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Sharp / Catharine Haglund vs Katherine Hyde / Palak Merchant6-7, 2-6
2022-09-22vs NHaskins/KBrewer (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Traudt / Anna Sharp vs Laura Brantley / Stacey Whitney6-4, 6-3
2022-09-15vs LFox (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCandace Azad / Austin Taylor vs Emily Weigel / Karol Kreshon6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-25vs STo (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Brock / Anna Sharp vs Shelley Brunker / Donna Thompson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-18vs WDunn (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAustin Taylor / Candace Azad vs Margaret Campbell / Julia Wilson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRyan Traudt / Anna Sharp vs Whitney Dunn / Natalie Lombardi6-3, 7-5
2022-08-11vs SJPragasam (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Taylor / Candace Azad vs Sameena Hassan / Julie Hollifield3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Anna Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Austin Taylor
published 4
3.71
Madeline Jurch
published 4
3.60
Candace Azad
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Karissa Chaplinsky
published
Ryan Traudt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeline Jurch + Ryan Traudt314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Sharp
62W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Austin Taylor
55W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Madeline Jurch
48W–48L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Candace Azad
132W–98L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Christy Haseltine
5W–23L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Karissa Chaplinsky
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Reynolds Morris
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Traudt
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.