Teams

Casual Sets

2022 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-02-19vs Lucky ShotsWon 31
L#1 SinglesJenny Lum vs Mai Etsumi2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Gentry / Nayda Mannle vs Miho May / Ellen Kishimoto7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Laura Hall6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Ray / Monique Maxey vs Bonnie Moy / Charlotte Hashimoto6-4, 6-1
2022-02-12vs High FivesLost 14
L#1 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Stacy Ray vs Janice Mizusawa / Dorothy Umeda6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRebecca Luria vs Jennifer Ostachuk1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnn Gardetto / Wendy Jackson vs Mary Kitsu / Debbie Aiu4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Sonavie Ong6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Gentry / SARAH KNOX vs Patsy Fukushima / Amy Iha4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-05vs KilaueaLost 23
L#1 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Lisa Gentry vs Christina Doane / Jodi Yamamoto4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJenny Lum vs Celia Shen6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Gardetto / Wendy Jackson vs April Woofter / Amy Leung6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Joanne Sakamaki7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCandice Gertonson / Keana Bate vs Michelle McGregor / Linda Chung2-6, 1-6
2022-01-29vs One Hit WondersLost 23
W#1 DoublesStacy Ray / Maureen O'Guin vs Carol Hasegawa / Holly Sung6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Alohalani Slover2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Gentry / Nancy Nagamine vs Sounthavy Minders / Winnieann Nishimiya4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJenny Lum vs Kimiona Watkins6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNayda Mannle / Tamar Sprecher vs Dayna Luka / Helen Ramos3-6, 4-6
2022-01-22vs Oahu Club SunsetWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Gentry / Nancy Nagamine vs Linda Onomoto / Susan Weander6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Sharon Lee2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Stacy Ray vs Estella Berg / Norma Hostelley6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJenny Lum vs S C6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWendy Jackson / SARAH KNOX vs Sarah Kistler / Veronica MacDonald6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-15vs Happy Happy Hour!Lost 13
W#1 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Lynn Morikawa6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Gentry / Nancy Nagamine vs Carolyn Izumigawa / Jamie Pang4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCandice Gertonson vs Sumi Matsumiya0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Pahlmeyer / Nayda Mannle vs Darlene Chang / Karen Nose3-6, 5-7
2022-01-08vs Wild TomcatsLost 14
L#1 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Stacy Ray vs Michelle Barratt / Kristy Scherman0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarsha Bentzinger vs Alison Akau1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Gentry / Nancy Nagamine vs Wendi Hoffman / Kulia Pacheco Boerstler6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Luria vs Natasa Revere1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Jackson / Ann Gardetto vs Cindy Siok / Jessica Hawkins2-6, 1-6
2019-04-13vs KilaueaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Harter / Maureen O'Guin vs Joanne Sakamaki / Celia Shen2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Nancy Nagamine
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Lisa Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.86
Ann Gardetto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Nayda Mannle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Rebecca Luria
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.72
Candice Gertonson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.66
Maureen O'Guin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jenny Lum
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Marsha Bentzinger
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Stacy Ray
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Wendy Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Nagamine + Lisa Gentry12558% games+6.2% vs expected
Nancy Nagamine + Ann Gardetto8167% games+5.5% vs expected
Maureen O'Guin + Stacy Ray3544% games+1.0% vs expected
Lisa Gentry + Stacy Ray4647% games−2.4% vs expected
Ann Gardetto + Candice Gertonson3247% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Jackson + Ann Gardetto224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Luria + Candice Gertonson044 matchesnot enough data
Maureen O'Guin + Rebecca Luria123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nancy Nagamine
59W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
Lisa Gentry
52W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Ann Gardetto
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Nayda Mannle
49W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Rebecca Luria
12W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Candice Gertonson
14W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Maureen O'Guin
64W–101L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jenny Lum
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marsha Bentzinger
7W–11L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Ray
15W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Jackson
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.