Teams

Taswell 6.0

2022 Frederick Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-02-26vs Hawk / ReefeLost 01
L#1 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Jason Watts vs Teresa Reefe / Scott Reefe6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-02-05vs Hawk / ReefeWon 10
W#1 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Majed Hamawy vs Lesley Leonard / MATTHEW HEINRICHS6-3, 6-1
2022-02-02vs Hawk / ReefeLost 01
L#1 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Jason Watts vs Jason LaRose / Kimberly LaRose5-7, 3-6
2022-01-26vs Hawk / ReefeWon 10
W#1 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Jatin Chhabra vs Gail Shenk / Rob Shenk7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-23vs Hawk / ReefeWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Scott / Majed Hamawy vs Jennifer Willie / Gordon Buist6-2, 7-5
2022-01-17vs Hawk / ReefeLost 01
L#3 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Kevin Brown vs Lesley Leonard / PETER TOMASULO3-6, 0-6
2022-01-15vs Hawk / ReefeWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelby Price / Majed Hamawy vs Kimberly LaRose / Jason LaRose7-6, 6-4
2022-01-10vs Hawk / ReefeWon 10
W#1 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Jason Watts vs Stephanie Heinrichs / MATTHEW HEINRICHS3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-03vs Hawk / ReefeWon 10
W#3 DoublesShaunte Taswell / Brian Myers vs Chad King / Lesley Leonard6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Sandy Thongphok
published 3.5
3.46
Jatin Chhabra
published
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Angela Sharma
published 3
2.88
Carrie Derse
published 3
2.79
Benjamin HAYES
published 3
2.46
Shaunte Taswell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Kominh Thongphok
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Shaunte Taswell2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandy Thongphok
277W–124L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
Jatin Chhabra
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Angela Sharma
57W–78L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Carrie Derse
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Benjamin HAYES
3W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
2.5
Shaunte Taswell
78W–105L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%63%37%
2.46
Kominh Thongphok
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.