Teams

BABIN/40/6.5/CWN/PRC

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 NO (40&O) Women Night

18 players · average NTRP 2.94 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 14 7:00 PM
Green Acres Country Club
Sep 21 7:00 PM
BMDCC
Sep 29 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Oct 7 7:00 PM
BMDCC
Oct 14 7:00 PM
BMDCC
2026-09-01vs Darden/Bisso/40/6.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracie Corales / Nicole Gibbons vs Elizabeth Charvat / Hana Choy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Gajewski / Mandy Parten vs Marie Darden / Natalie Pottharst1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAriane MacAlester / LeAnne Woessner vs Kim Bauer / Parnia Abolhassan Choubdar0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 NO (40&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Katie Cambre
published
3.02
Darlene Landry
published 3.5
2.92
Beth Generes
published 3
2.80
LeAnne Woessner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Michelle Perdomo
published
2.79
2.76
Shawn Marie Rutland
published
Brooke Harris
published 3
2.72
Azucena Riverea
published 3
2.71
Kelly Marcus
published
2.51
Courtney Comeaux
published 3
2.48
Kelly Gajewski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Tracie Corales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Angie Thomas
published 2.5
2.38
Ariane MacAlester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
June Babin
published
Mandy Parten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Gibbons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Marcus + Michelle Perdomo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Cambre
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Darlene Landry
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Beth Generes
24W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
LeAnne Woessner
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Michelle Perdomo
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Crystal Cantrelle
9W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Shawn Marie Rutland
11W–0L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Brooke Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Azucena Riverea
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Kelly Marcus
15W–25L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Courtney Comeaux
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
Kelly Gajewski
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Tracie Corales
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
2.5
Angie Thomas
2W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Ariane MacAlester
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
June Babin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mandy Parten
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Gibbons
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.