Teams

WC RED

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-02vs EM BLUESplit 11
W#2 DoublesCraig Masur / Stacy Masur vs Michele Olree / Andy Olree6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Ream / Jim Upton vs Jean Steimel / David Steimel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-01vs SS-H GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Upton / Stephanie Burt vs Timothy Burwell / Nantida Hong4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-06-24vs GCC BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesJim Upton / Jennifer Woodrow vs Alexander Linville / Franny Schmidt2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Pulver / Stephanie Burt vs Kenneth Hunt / Breanna Hunt1-6, 2-6
2023-06-21vs SS-LT REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesEyal Tzarfati / Amy Wiedeman vs Lynne Monnar / Max Cohen2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Masur / Craig Masur vs Bethana Kuchenbecker / Shane Newberg2-6, 3-6
2023-06-18vs HG REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesStacy Masur / Craig Masur vs Mary Dewar / Zack Palmer4-6, 4-6
2023-05-28vs GAC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesStacy Masur / Craig Masur vs Rhonda Buder / Dirk Hanket3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Ream / Jim Upton vs Virginia Davie / Alexander Sobolevsky6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-21vs PRC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Burt / Eyal Tzarfati vs Scott Liestman / Denise Debartolomeis7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Steve Pulver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Eyal Tzarfati
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Stephanie Burt
published
3.04
Stacy Masur
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Amy Wiedeman
published 3.5
2.97
Jim Upton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Chase Adams
published 3
2.71
Craig Masur
published 3
2.50
Laura Ream
published
Jennifer Woodrow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Masur + Craig Masur033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Pulver
49W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Eyal Tzarfati
45W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Stephanie Burt
8W–21L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Stacy Masur
100W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Wiedeman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Jim Upton
36W–71L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Chase Adams
6W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Craig Masur
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Laura Ream
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Jennifer Woodrow
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.