Teams

8.0 Team

2026 USTA Adult 55&Over League - Abilene · 8.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-11vs Osborn TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesRandy Ivey / Rick McClure vs Stephen Osborn / Kurt Wasmer3-6
L#2 DoublesMike McClure / Robert Casselman vs Scott Brown / David Robinett4-6
2026-04-06vs Osborn TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Ivey / Rick McClure vs Stephen Osborn / Kurt Wasmer3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Casselman / Mike McClure vs Scott Brown / David Robinett3-6
L#3 DoublesRoy Jones / Gil Deshazo vs Craig Smyser / Kenneth Mauldin3-6
2026-04-04vs Osborn TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Casselman / Mike McClure vs Bryan Fowlkes / Craig Smyser3-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Ivey / Rick McClure vs Clayton Coker / Kenneth Mauldin3-6
2026-04-04vs Osborn TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Casselman / Mike McClure vs Bryan Fowlkes / Craig Smyser3-6
L#2 DoublesRick McClure / Randy Ivey vs Clayton Coker / Kenneth Mauldin3-6
L#3 DoublesRoy Jones / Gil Deshazo vs Kurt Wasmer / Stephen Osborn3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Evans Team40120045
28.0 Team040121297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Randy Ivey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.25
Gil Deshazo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mike McClure
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Rick McClure
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Casselman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roy Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Casselman + Mike McClure044 matchesnot enough data
Randy Ivey + Rick McClure044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randy Ivey
3W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
Gil Deshazo
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.25
Mike McClure
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rick McClure
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Casselman
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roy Jones
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.