Teams

Polk/Clark/18&Over5.5W

2024 Polk Combo 18 & Over Spring · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-10vs Beerman - K. NeighborsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRuthie Tait / Lauren Clark vs Denisse Riddle / Regina Espitia6-3, 6-0
2024-06-03vs Grasslands - K. IngleWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Lloyd / Ruthie Tait vs Kandy Wood / Sandy Smyth7-6, 6-2
2024-05-13vs Beerman - C. Vander PoelLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Layug / Jesse Larson vs Caroline Miller / Paxtan Keller3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRuthie Tait / Brandy Lansford vs Merlisa Lawrence Corbett / Jennifer Chevalier6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJanet Layug / Ruthie Tait vs Jan Hyman / Alexandra Henderson6-1, 6-3
2024-04-08vs Grasslands - K. IngleWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Layug / Ruthie Tait vs Jihyeon Choe / Catherine Futch6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Janet Layug
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Brittany Craig
published 3.5
3.31
Ruthie Tait
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Lauren Clark
published
3.02
Lauren Lloyd
published
Courtney Larson
published 3
2.65
Brandy Lansford
published 3
2.64
2.54
Rachel Hollis
published
2.46
Hilary Crenshaw
published
2.45
Leah Grieger
published
2.28
Jesse Larson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Layug + Ruthie Tait9077% games+14.8% vs expected
Hilary Crenshaw + Courtney Phillips033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Layug
89W–36L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Brittany Craig
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Ruthie Tait
80W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Lauren Clark
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Lauren Lloyd
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Courtney Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Brandy Lansford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Courtney Phillips
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.64
Rachel Hollis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Hilary Crenshaw
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46
Leah Grieger
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.45
Jesse Larson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.