Teams

SRochkind-UNC

2026 Eno River Adult 65 & Over · 65 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-20vs DNagelhout65-HSLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Hilsabeck / Bradley Hubinek vs Dave Thomas / Van Blalock6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Brian Moore vs Rick Edmunds / David Naden2-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs DNagelhout65-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Weissler / Robert Miller vs Mike Kempel / Van Blalock3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Hubinek / MICHAEL LANCASTER vs Mike Liller / Dave Thomas0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Hilsabeck / Robert Crane vs Hayes Hofler / Darrell Bradfield2-6, 4-6
2026-04-06vs DNagelhout65-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Bradley Hubinek vs Mike Kempel / Dave Thomas0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Moore / David Hilsabeck vs Darrell Bradfield / Van Blalock2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Flack / MICHAEL LANCASTER vs Mike Liller / David Nagelhout3-6, 3-6
2026-04-04vs DNagelhout65-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Robert Crane vs Dave Thomas / Rick Edmunds1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Molpus / Robert Long vs Van Blalock / David Nagelhout4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Eaton / David Hilsabeck vs Hayes Hofler / Mike Kempel2-6, 0-6
2026-03-30vs DNagelhout65-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Moore / David Molpus vs Dave Thomas / David Naden2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Robert Long vs Mike Kempel / Mike Liller0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Hubinek / Ken Eaton vs Rick Edmunds / Van Blalock3-6, 1-6
2026-03-23vs DNagelhout65-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Mark Weissler vs Dave Thomas / Mike Liller1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Miller / Robert Long vs David Naden / Darrell Bradfield6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKen Eaton / Robert Crane vs Van Blalock / Rick Edmunds0-6, 4-6
2026-03-20vs DNagelhout65-HSWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Hilsabeck / Mark Weissler vs Mike Kempel / Rick Edmunds3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Long / David Molpus vs Dave Thomas / David Nagelhout6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKen Eaton / MICHAEL LANCASTER vs Hayes Hofler / David Naden6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DNagelhout65-HS611748112
2SRochkind-UNC1641735229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Robert Long
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
2.82
David Hilsabeck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.74
David Molpus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Peter Flack
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.54
Steven Rochkind
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.50
MICHAEL LANCASTER
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Bradley Hubinek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Mark Weissler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Ken Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Richard Jaskot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Steven Rochkind044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Long
21W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
David Hilsabeck
3W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
David Molpus
3W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Peter Flack
11W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Steven Rochkind
7W–45L career · 11 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
MICHAEL LANCASTER
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Bradley Hubinek
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Mark Weissler
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Ken Eaton
4W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
Richard Jaskot
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.