Teams

West/Ulin

2026 Women's Day League · 3.5 - Winter

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-06-09vs Gundell/SeeligLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmrita Pendharkar / Shabnam Hariri vs Leigh Flayton / Marie Chandra5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-04vs Gundell/SeeligLost 01
L#3 DoublesJaime Fliman / Shabnam Hariri vs Patty Reitkopf / Sandra Borrelle3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-27vs Gundell/SeeligWon 10
W#2 DoublesJaime Fliman / Shabnam Hariri vs Elizete Groenendaal / Meghan Astrachan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-19vs Gundell/SeeligLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Amrita Pendharkar vs Marie Chandra / Leigh Flayton3-6, 0-6
2026-04-29vs Gundell/SeeligSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmrita Pendharkar / Alicia Ulin vs Jane Gundell / Leigh Flayton5-7, 5-4
L#3 DoublesSusan West / Shabnam Hariri vs Michele Hootstein / Patty Reitkopf3-6, 3-6
2026-02-26vs Gundell/SeeligLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Coppolino / Nikola Hennes vs Michele Hootstein / Lesley Miller0-6, 0-6
2026-02-12vs Ziluca/BonillaWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Manheim / Lien Do vs Christie Bonilla / Lea Lasman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Amrita Pendharkar vs Lisbeth Kaiser / Cynthia Goodstein6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Adams / Jennifer Sohn vs Kelsey Karsten / Deanna D'Amore6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-05vs Welles/GouldLost 12
L#1 DoublesLien Do / Alicia Ulin vs Ingrid Bateman / Natasha Caronna3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Adams / Shabnam Hariri vs Patricia Gould / Susan Zeigler7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJarret Stephens / Heather Gordon vs Radhika Rathore / Marcelle de Soares6-7, 3-5
2026-01-29vs Gundell/SeeligLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Manheim / Shabnam Hariri vs Lesley Miller / Lorri Ahl1-6, 5-7
2026-01-21vs Ziluca/BonillaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Blanco / Alicia Ulin vs Marki Zabar / Christie Bonilla5-7, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmrita Pendharkar / Susan West vs Lisa Ferree / Sarah Raeben1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Manheim / ELLEN STEIN vs Cynthia Goodstein / Deanna D'Amore6-2, 6-4
2026-01-15vs Welles/GouldWon 21
W#1 DoublesLien Do / Stephanie Manheim vs Ingrid Bateman / Natasha Caronna6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Adams / Alicia Ulin vs Nellie Debruyn / Karen Flagg1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesELLEN STEIN / Jaime Fliman vs Radhika Rathore / Marcelle de Soares6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 - Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Lien Do
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.32
Lindsay Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Diana Gershuny
published 3.5
ELLEN STEIN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Heather Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Marjorie Adams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Stephanie Manheim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Amrita Pendharkar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Shabnam Hariri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Susan West
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.90
Alicia Ulin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.82
Jennifer Sohn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jaime Fliman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Haynee Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jarret Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nikola Hennes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Ulin + Jaime Fliman3257% games+11.7% vs expected
Haynee Johnson + Susan West2349% gamesnot enough data
Alicia Ulin + Diana Gershuny314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Blanco + Diana Gershuny134 matchesnot enough data
Lien Do + ELLEN STEIN123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Sohn + Jaime Fliman213 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Ulin + Lindsay Blanco303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lien Do
40W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Lindsay Blanco
21W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Diana Gershuny
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
ELLEN STEIN
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Heather Gordon
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Marjorie Adams
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Stephanie Manheim
45W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
3.5
Amrita Pendharkar
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
Shabnam Hariri
3W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Susan West
7W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3.5
Alicia Ulin
42W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jennifer Sohn
8W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Jaime Fliman
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Haynee Johnson
3W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Jarret Stephens
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nikola Hennes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.