Teams

WS Brady

2025 Alachua Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-06vs Alachua/Lai/55&OverMenLost 01
L#3 DoublesRay Brady / George Cockey vs Jixiu Shan / Robert Tangeman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-23vs DB PuLost 02
L#1 DoublesRay Brady / Paul Askew vs Ed Stark / Jorg Bungert4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGeorge Cockey / Donald van Schuppen vs Sorin Fratila / HEE-SUNG BAE1-6, 3-6
2025-03-02vs DB PuSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Askew / Ray Brady vs Jerry Lu / Ed Stark6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Flowers / Malcolm Maden vs Kevin Smith / Malcolm H Waldron III1-6, 2-6
2025-02-26vs Alachua/Lai/55&OverMenLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald van Schuppen / Malcolm Maden vs Timothy Ferguson / Bo Zhao1-6, 3-6
2025-02-09vs DB PuLost 01
L#3 DoublesRay Brady / George Cockey vs HEE-SUNG BAE / Sorin Fratila6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-02vs Alachua/Lai/55&OverMenLost 01
L#2 DoublesRay Brady / Malcolm Maden vs Timothy Ferguson / Chihong Yun3-6, 1-6
2025-01-25vs DB PuLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Cockey / Fred Gruen vs Jian Pu / Malcolm H Waldron III6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Asoo Vakharia
published 3.5
3.23
Fred Gruen
published
3.23
Paul Askew
published
3.11
Jack Jacobs
published
3.04
Hank Dudding
published
3.01
Ray Brady
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
George Cockey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
John Flowers
published
Malcolm Maden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Cockey + Malcolm Maden0923% gamesnot enough data
Ray Brady + George Cockey1440% gamesnot enough data
Ray Brady + Malcolm Maden0518% gamesnot enough data
Paul Askew + Asoo Vakharia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Asoo Vakharia
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Fred Gruen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Paul Askew
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jack Jacobs
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Hank Dudding
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Ray Brady
31W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
George Cockey
17W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
John Flowers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Malcolm Maden
34W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Wright
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.