Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0 W GML Lake Country WAC Kramer

2023 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesLinda Balthazor vs Marin Koebert1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Frohna / Mercedes Paz vs Allison Bardole / Deborah Pape0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Huck vs Angela Canadeo0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAnna Huck / Linda Balthazor vs Renee LeSage / Marta Conlon1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Schultz vs Ava Bradd3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKrin Kramer / Mercedes Paz vs Claudia Beaudoin / Julia Haas1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFran Davis / Olga Huber vs Maye Berroya / Bethany Bradd2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Sica Manders / Anna Huck vs Karen Papcke / Amy Pulokas2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesOlga Huber / Anna Huck vs Megan Paddock / Melissa Hoeft4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKrin Kramer vs Jill Lundvall2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFran Davis / Linda Balthazor vs Monica Lineberger / Savannah Ferkins5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Schultz vs Colleen MUTCHLER6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJANE SCHNEIDER / Mary Sica Manders vs Julie Klein / Mary Kay Kaufmann4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKrin Kramer / Mercedes Paz vs Wendy Cartwright / Laura Duffy1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Schultz vs Linda Curtis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFran Davis / Mary Sica Manders vs Monica Thomas / Jane Mlenar1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLinda Balthazor vs Shelley Burns1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesOlga Huber / JANE SCHNEIDER vs Janice Gardetto / Kim Smazal0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesFran Davis / Mercedes Paz vs Julie Kutil / Lisa Reedy0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Balthazor vs Julie McLain1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Huck / Krin Kramer vs Stephanie Jansen / Jeanne Bieser3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Mary Sica Manders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Anna Huck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
Mercedes Paz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Linda Balthazor
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.07
Olga Huber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Fran Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
JANE SCHNEIDER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Schultz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Krin Kramer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Frohna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Huck + Mercedes Paz134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Sica Manders + Linda Balthazor303 matchesnot enough data
Krin Kramer + Mercedes Paz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Sica Manders
16W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Anna Huck
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Mercedes Paz
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
Linda Balthazor
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Olga Huber
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Fran Davis
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
JANE SCHNEIDER
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Schultz
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Krin Kramer
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Frohna
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.