Teams

Toups

2025 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.0-3.5-4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-08vs IshidaLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Ringel / Leigh Sheppard vs Eiko Ishida / Lori Mcwhorter6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Watt / Beth Beckwith vs Kayla Saing / Erika McCann1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Arias / Lindsey Anderson vs Lindsey Castner / Laura Stokes3-6, 3-6
2025-11-08vs AlbusLost 12
L#1 DoublesSummer McAmis / Katherine Chu vs Kimberly Grogan / Gilda Tebeaux2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Toups / Sara Thurber vs Renee Yackira / Julie Baugh0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Jacobs / Morgan Hyslip vs Briana Stierwalt / Kim Milam1-6, 1-6
2025-11-07vs DurborawLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Ringel / Maddie Marney vs Jennifer McNamara / Tracy Sellers6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Palko / Katherine Chu vs Michelle Barron / Stephanie Robinson3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLinda Kiraly / Christina Jacobs vs Maura Jackson / Cindy Trammell2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0-3.5-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Leigh Sheppard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Summer McAmis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Megan Toups
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Katherine Chu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Beth Beckwith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Palko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Sara Thurber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
JOSALYN SAMSON
published 3.5
2.90
Linda Kiraly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Emily Watt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Lauren Arias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Christina Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Morgan Hyslip
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Ringel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maddie Marney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Chu + Megan Toups4258% games+11.5% vs expected
Emily Watt + Beth Beckwith2346% games+1.5% vs expected
Christina Jacobs + Morgan Hyslip213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Ringel + Maddie Marney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Sheppard
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Summer McAmis
2W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Megan Toups
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Katherine Chu
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Beth Beckwith
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Palko
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sara Thurber
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
JOSALYN SAMSON
11W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Linda Kiraly
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Emily Watt
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lauren Arias
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Christina Jacobs
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Morgan Hyslip
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lauren Ringel
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maddie Marney
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.