Teams

NIN SB 18&O 4.0 M: Concord Grove

NIN SB Adult 18 & Over · NIN SB 18 & Over 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesScott Abshagen / Andre Ziebold vs Kenneth Heckel / Daniel Schwartz6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAdam Gunther vs Gabriel Montero3-6, 4-5
2026-07-02vs NIN SB 18&O 4.0 M: LP Bayer/WolffLost 13
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Clements / Mitchell McDonald vs Alex Boyer / Gabriel Montero1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Gunther vs Jalen Bayer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Tan / Gene Grove vs Nipun Sodhi / Erik Enghag3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesScott Abshagen / Raymond Suth vs Ronnie Coleman / Raymond Korson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-25Split 11
L#1 DoublesScott Abshagen / Spencer Dexter vs Jalen Bayer / Connor King5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Clements / Gene Grove vs Raymond Korson / Brent Wolff6-2, 7-5
2026-06-18vs NIN SB 18&O 4.0 M: LP Bayer/WolffLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Abshagen / Mitchell McDonald vs Jalen Bayer / Alex Boyer4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Clements / Dan Oakley vs Steve Bibi / Ronnie Coleman6-7, 4-6
2026-06-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJonathan Tan / Gene Grove vs Steve Bibi / Connor King6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Clements / Dan Oakley vs Jalen Bayer / Eric Cender4-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs NIN SB 18&O 4.0 M: LP Bayer/WolffWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Clements / Dan Oakley vs Tim Lawmaster / Daniel Schwartz4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Abshagen / Mitchell McDonald vs Nicholas Catapano / Brent Wolff6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NIN SB 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jeffrey Clements
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Scott Abshagen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Adam Gunther
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Gene Grove
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Clements + Gene Grove213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Clements
47W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Scott Abshagen
70W–83L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Adam Gunther
45W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Gene Grove
27W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.