Teams

ALACHUA/Schafer/Men/6.5

2022 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-16vs DB - DemopoulosWon 10
W#2 DoublesChad Schafer / Nathan Whitaker vs DALTON IEIRI / Marc Schnoll6-4, 6-4
2022-12-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesCory Hanson / Paul Wesson vs David Fuller / Brian Oen6-3, 6-4
2022-12-02vs HCC - HwangWon 21
L#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Chad Schafer vs Don Baik / Yong Jae Ko6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Thomas Yonge vs Philip Kang / Changburm Cho6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Tooke / Paul Wesson vs Kewei Xu / Xiaoping Zhang6-4, 6-1
2022-11-19vs WS - SpinkWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Thomas Yonge vs Austin Manning / Camilo Fita7-6, 6-4
2022-11-15vs DB - DemopoulosWon 20
W#1 DoublesCory Hanson / Paul Wesson vs HEE-SUNG BAE / George Demopoulos6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Ed Stark vs DALTON IEIRI / Dan Weisman6-4, 6-4
2022-11-04vs Hawkstone HCC - WesterburgSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichael Tooke / Paul Wesson vs Joseph Cox IV / Kevin Smith2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEd Stark / Nathan Wycoff vs Keith Myers / Eduardo Rondon5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-28vs HCC - HwangSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteve Pratscher / Paul Wesson vs Don Baik / Changburm Cho2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChad Schafer / Boris Kuchuk vs Chihong Yun / Sanghun Shin6-2, 6-2
2022-10-14vs WS - SpinkWon 20
W#1 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Chad Schafer vs Isaac Barron / Thomas Duffaut7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Paul Wesson vs Timothy Ferguson / Jorge Torres-Vazquez6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Boris Kuchuk
published 4
3.52
Paul Wesson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Chad Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
William Haveman
published
3.42
Thomas Yonge
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.38
Ed Stark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Scott Rowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Schafer + Ed Stark8263% gamesnot enough data
Ed Stark + Thomas Yonge6450% gamesnot enough data
Paul Wesson + Thomas Yonge9158% gamesnot enough data
Chad Schafer + Paul Wesson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Boris Kuchuk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Paul Wesson
123W–72L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Chad Schafer
109W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
William Haveman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Thomas Yonge
149W–75L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Ed Stark
288W–120L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Scott Rowe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.