Teams

GEPTA-4.5-Adult/18+W(Mora)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 4.21 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Ibarra vs Courteney Park2-6, 1-6
2024-09-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesRosa Chivardi-Ortiz / Andrea Ibarra vs Alehanna Kehr- Gomez / Renee Isabella Quevedo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Ibarra / Valeria Delgado vs Claudia Calderon / Marisa Porras6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Erika Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
Andrea Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Amy Orourke
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 4.5
3.79
Artemisa Ortega
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Delaney Kuehnel
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.73
Diana Lozano
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Beatrice Maese
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 4
Maru Barua
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Mayra Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Miroslava Barua
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Rocio Mora
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Sara Kaltwasser
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Valeria Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz + Artemisa Ortega7256% games+0.4% vs expected
Miroslava Barua + Maru Barua411357% games−1.0% vs expected
Melissa Hufft + Mayra Gonzalez5651% gamesnot enough data
Sara Kaltwasser + Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz5554% gamesnot enough data
Erika Herrera + Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz3645% gamesnot enough data
Erika Herrera + Artemisa Ortega5260% gamesnot enough data
Erika Herrera + Miroslava Barua4255% gamesnot enough data
Diana Lozano + Sara Kaltwasser314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erika Herrera
22W–12L career · 14 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Andrea Ibarra
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Amy Orourke
69W–33L career · 26 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4
Artemisa Ortega
54W–53L career · 18 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Delaney Kuehnel
32W–14L career · 14 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Diana Lozano
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Beatrice Maese
75W–87L career · 17 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Maru Barua
47W–19L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mayra Gonzalez
49W–50L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miroslava Barua
56W–24L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocio Mora
48W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz
80W–38L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Kaltwasser
84W–48L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Delgado
26W–13L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.