Teams

SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA2

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesCathy Shin / Sachiko Kawai vs Marisa Oh / Janice Park5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLinh Preston / Sachiko Kawai vs Ariana Garcia / Megumi Kodama7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSachiko Kawai / Linh Preston vs Kaihong Su / Annie Pham6-2, 7-5
2025-06-14vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU2Won 10
W#3 DoublesLinh Preston / Sachiko Kawai vs Josephine Chow / Jennifer Yu6-1, 6-0
2025-06-07vs SGV Arcadia Aces-Li-Arcadia-Sa3/5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSachiko Kawai / Linh Preston vs Grace Moss / Diep Ho4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLinh Preston / Lauren Walden vs Kimberly Albright / Jill Tomich0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesSachiko Kawai / Linh Preston vs Oraer Pluta / Chelle Farquhar2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLauren Walden / Sachiko Kawai vs Christina Buckley / Teryl Murphy6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Mei Wong
published
3.01
Sachiko Kawai
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.00
Maree Lingao
published
2.91
Linh Preston
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.90
Eileen Yip
published
2.74
BECKY LEE
published 3
2.70
2.56
Fanny Gee
published
2.55
Penny Penniston
published
2.52
Johanna Kammerer
published
2.44
Cathy Shin
published 3
2.19
Chris Konya
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linh Preston + Sachiko Kawai18760% games+7.8% vs expected
Mei Wong + Penny Penniston123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mei Wong
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Sachiko Kawai
27W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Maree Lingao
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3
Linh Preston
20W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Eileen Yip
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
BECKY LEE
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Camille Farnsworth
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Fanny Gee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Penny Penniston
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Johanna Kammerer
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Cathy Shin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Chris Konya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.