Teams

SFV Team Paseo

SFV-Adult 55 & Over · SFV Women 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-21vs SFV-LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Kuncar / LB Hatch vs Amy Newhall / Elena Saydah3-6, 2-6
2021-07-31vs SFV-LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Kuncar / Annie Schwartz vs MARIATHILDE BATOON / Ade Quingco6-7, 1-6
2021-07-25vs SFV Team BraemarWon 20
W#2 DoublesLB Hatch / Annie Schwartz vs Denise Joan / Susan Alverson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Kuncar / Karen Watts vs Robin Fishman / Tami Olshan6-3, 6-1
2021-07-18vs SFV Team BraemarWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Evans / Tracy Kuncar vs Sharon Aguila / Theresa Chase6-4, 3-2
2021-06-12vs SFV-LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaula Evans / Tracy Kuncar vs Nancy Closson / Donna Leventhal6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Patricia Dunn
published
3.87
Paula Evans
published
3.81
Teresa Loveland
published 4
3.72
3.65
Joann Miles
published
3.53
3.43
Annie Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Karen Watts
published
3.24
Tracy Kuncar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.22
Wangie Pineda
published 3.5
Judy Maly
published
LB Hatch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Loveland + Patricia Dunn16856% games+2.1% vs expected
Patricia Dunn + Paula Evans8456% games−1.5% vs expected
Annie Schwartz + Tracy Kuncar2647% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Loveland + Paula Evans314 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Kuncar + Wangie Pineda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Dunn
23W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
Paula Evans
39W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Teresa Loveland
94W–61L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Gabriela Vodanovic
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Joann Miles
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Elizabeth Hackelton
6W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Annie Schwartz
144W–179L career · 2 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.43
Karen Watts
83W–43L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Tracy Kuncar
79W–85L career · 9 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Wangie Pineda
96W–110L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
Judy Maly
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
LB Hatch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.