Teams

CACM RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs CM GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Margot Kelly / Jennifer Cook3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Laurie Korneffel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEleanor Morse / Yvette Dolan vs Kendall Carbone / Anne Doubet4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Sarah Stavros vs Alison Thompson / Megan Draper7-5, 6-4
2022-07-12vs WP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Lesleigh Anderson vs Laurie Wagner / Laura Lapsys3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Marissa Ogden5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEleanor Morse / Susan Sundeen vs Phyllis Suarez / Kim Collins6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesYvette Dolan / Sarah Stavros vs Susan Anderson / Michelle Telfer3-6, 4-6
2022-07-05vs SKY GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesEleanor Morse / Lesleigh Anderson vs Camilla Almuti / Christine Atkinson4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Pam Price6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Amy Raval / Lyndsey McLaughlan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDarcy Kinnersley / Yvette Dolan vs Casey Hermansen / Rachel Byrne2-6, 0-6
2022-06-28vs DTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaya Pingle Trinen / Eleanor Morse vs Marcy Eastman / Trisha Cohen7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Robyn Tolva4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Stavros / Darcy Kinnersley vs Stephanie Martins / Mary McFadyen2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Sundeen / Stephanie Bolsei vs Tracy McIlroy / Katherine Koch6-3, 6-3
2022-06-21vs WP NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Karen Allaire / Jennifer Ranum6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Bonnie King7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Sundeen / Stephanie Bolsei vs Ginny Crise / Mary Albair1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Stavros / Darcy Kinnersley vs Tamara Whelpley / Kelly Goodnough6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-16vs GTC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesMerrell Aspin / Lesleigh Anderson vs AMY SITZE / Cyndie Miller6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Karen Ryan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Sundeen / Eleanor Morse vs Maureen Clarke / Cindy Miller6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDarcy Kinnersley / Sarah Stavros vs Dianne Johnson-Pape / Gwendolyn Bradshaw7-6, 6-1
2022-06-14vs GPTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaya Pingle Trinen / Lesleigh Anderson vs Robyn Frahm / Caroline Walker6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJulie McClung vs Renee Morris6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Bolsei / Susan Sundeen vs Sarah Sexton / Heather Colliander7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDarcy Kinnersley / Yvette Dolan vs Julie Pellet / Molly Holland3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Julie McClung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Eleanor Morse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Merrell Aspin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.65
Sarah Stavros
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.40
Susan Sundeen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Darcy Kinnersley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lesleigh Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Bolsei
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Yvette Dolan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Stavros + Darcy Kinnersley2348% games+8.9% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Stephanie Bolsei3348% games+6.7% vs expected
Lesleigh Anderson + Merrell Aspin4351% games+4.7% vs expected
Merrell Aspin + Maya Pingle Trinen31441% games−2.7% vs expected
Susan Sundeen + Stephanie Bolsei3836% games−5.3% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Susan Sundeen044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Sundeen + Eleanor Morse224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Stavros + Maya Pingle Trinen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Julie McClung
53W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Eleanor Morse
36W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Merrell Aspin
78W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Maya Pingle Trinen
24W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Sarah Stavros
25W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Susan Sundeen
21W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Darcy Kinnersley
3W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lesleigh Anderson
25W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Bolsei
20W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yvette Dolan
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.