Teams

Ja.Bossert40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-07vs Er.Oliver40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesMargaret Barham / Corinna Proctor vs Debi Booker / Erica Oliver6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Bonistalli / Jessica Tyndall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-30vs Je.Komes40C2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJane Bossert / Corinna Proctor vs Jenny Komes / Kenie Wrenn6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Barham / Jessica Tyndall vs Valerie Clowes / Christine Harris1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-24vs Ca.Garrett40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY KOCH / Corinna Proctor vs Laura Edgerton / Tara Rouse2-6, 2-6
2023-09-18vs Sa.Highsmith40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Bossert / Jessica Tyndall vs Anna Goodmon / Katherine Teague2-6, 3-6
2023-09-16vs Ka.Wahle40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY KOCH / Corinna Proctor vs Katie Taylor / Shannon Sikes6-2, 6-3
2023-08-26vs Fr.Harris40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Tyndall / Margaret Barham vs Fran Harris / Casey Novak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-19vs Ca.Langlois40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY KOCH / Corinna Proctor vs Michele Nowicki / Crystal Beard4-6, 1-6
2023-08-05vs Me.Proctor40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Stacey Stephens vs Melissa Proctor / Beth Farrell2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Stacey Stephens
published
3.01
Corinna Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.84
AMY KOCH
published 3
2.60
Jessica Tyndall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.56
Allison Dugan
published 3
2.54
Jennifer Cotner
published 2.5
2.46
Margaret Barham
published
2.23
Jane Bossert
published
2.07
Rachel Bonistalli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinna Proctor + Jennifer Cotner4162% gamesnot enough data
Allison Dugan + Margaret Barham224 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Stephens + Corinna Proctor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Stephens
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Corinna Proctor
74W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
AMY KOCH
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
49W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%22%78%
2.60
3
Allison Dugan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Jennifer Cotner
36W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%38%62%
2.54
Margaret Barham
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%64%36%
2.46
Jane Bossert
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.23
Rachel Bonistalli
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.