Teams

Bonita National - Pohorence

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.0 Adult 40 & over -Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Meghan Kellam6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-02-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Sophia Scott6-4, 6-3
2022-02-21vs Fiddlers Creek - L. FarnhamLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenny Pohorence / Vivian Wong vs Maria Oddy / Michelle Trapani4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Sara Anderson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-02-07vs The Quarry - MooneyWon 10
W#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Aileen Jacobs6-0, 6-1
2022-01-31vs Cambier - FerrettiLost 01
L#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Robin Krawczyk7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-01-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Jill Sanders6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-17vs Mediterra - VaccariWon 10
W#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Michelle DeBaltzo6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Vicky Ramuta6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-03vs Marco YMCA - NelzLost 01
L#1 SinglesVivian Wong vs Inge Lund0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & over -Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Laura Cirillo
published
3.19
Ellen Evans
published 3.5
3.11
Susan Lindberg
published
3.08
Vivian Wong
usually #1 Singles 90%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published
3.00
Cindy Mitchell
published 3
2.95
Suzanne Fruendt
published
Eva Piazza
published 3
2.67
Claire Premo
published 3
Jenny Pohorence
published
Lisa Taylor
published
Roxana Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vivian Wong + Susan Lindberg4547% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Cirillo
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Ellen Evans
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Susan Lindberg
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Vivian Wong
119W–80L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Cindy Mitchell
17W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Suzanne Fruendt
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Eva Piazza
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Navarre Paladino
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Claire Premo
16W–40L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
2.67
Jenny Pohorence
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Taylor
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roxana Scott
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.