Teams

IRMSL - Buttonwood/Roux

2021 IRMSL Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women - Thursday night

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-24vs Nrs - MurraySplit 11
L#1 SinglesSandy Palma vs Luisa Subia0-4
W#2 DoublesCynthia DiNenna / Karen Higgins vs Renee' Palmer / Grace Pillari6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-06-17vs Blvd - TillmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Regan Chatel vs Miley Cyr / Tara Ramsey6-4, 6-1
2021-06-10vs 2nd -Whispering Pines - JCollinWon 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Sandy Palma vs Elize VanZyl / Jeanne Collin6-3, 6-4
2021-06-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Karen Higgins vs Cynthia Harkins / Monika Calderin2-6, 3-6
2021-05-28vs Blvd - TillmanSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKaren Higgins vs Paula Hoekzema2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Grossnickle / Sandy Palma vs Leslie London / Miley Cyr7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-20vs 2nd -Whispering Pines - JCollinWon 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia DiNenna / Karen Higgins vs Charlotte Higgins / Anna Haman6-3, 6-2
2021-05-13vs Nrs - MurrayWon 10
W#3 DoublesRegan Chatel / Karen Higgins vs Lisa Thiesen / Jerri Brennan6-2, 6-1
2021-05-12vs Blvd - TillmanWon 20
W#2 SinglesKaren Higgins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Theresa Dubiel vs Alison Feagin / Sherri Glaab6-2, 6-3
2021-04-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Theresa Dubiel vs Michele Modica / Charlotte Higgins6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - Thursday night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Abigail Flood
published 4.5
3.88
Regan Chatel
published
3.84
Sandy Palma
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Elisabeth Smith
published 4
3.69
Theresa Dubiel
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Karen Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tanya Mikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dubiel + Sandy Palma4353% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Karen Higgins2448% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Dubiel + Karen Higgins1446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abigail Flood
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Theresa Dubiel
49W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Karen Higgins
24W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tanya Mikel
12W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.