Teams

Perry/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-16vs Smead/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKate Dance / Mallory Wright vs Martha Filipkowski / Renee Trent6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNatalia Ward / Jan Major vs Jana Dovgan / Lauren Goodman5-7, 3-6
2026-04-26vs Waide/Smith/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalia Ward / Mallory Wright vs Alaina Smith / Kim Huinker7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hernandez-gomez vs Hollie Smith2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesVeerle Keppens / Joanna Case vs Meg Stratton / Jamie Iverson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-11vs Smead/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Theyken / Natalia Ward vs Jana Dovgan / Angela Rae Rhody1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Hernandez-gomez vs Rhonda Mann7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJan Major / Joanna Case vs Jodi St Charles / Lauren Goodman2-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs Waide/Smith/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Rice / Natalia Ward vs Hollie Smith / Alyssa Maddox6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrea Hernandez-gomez vs Alaina Smith6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIrene Shivers / Mallory Wright vs Kim Huinker / LeAnn Waide4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Natalia Ward
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.30
Mallory Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Irene Shivers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Andrea Hernandez-gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Veerle Keppens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Joanna Case
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Melissa Theyken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Theyken + Natalia Ward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Ward
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
Mallory Wright
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Irene Shivers
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Andrea Hernandez-gomez
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Veerle Keppens
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Joanna Case
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Melissa Theyken
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.