Teams

CROW CANYON CC 18AW3.5A-DT

2022 ADULT 18&Over Daytime · Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Catherine Griffin3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPia Moore / Heather Brown vs Nancy Blom / Shelly Adams6-0, 6-4
2022-06-02vs BAY CLUB PL 18AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Daisy Maron6-4, 6-0
2022-05-19vs BAY TREES PK 18AW3.5A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Baker / Miriam DeQuadros vs Julie Borjon / Tracey Hull1-0
W#2 DoublesPia Moore / Dana Kruger vs Belinda Castillo / Tinara Choing7-5, 7-5
2022-05-12vs DIABLO CC 18AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelley Lober / Miriam DeQuadros vs Alexis Bybel / Heidi Corkern7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-12vs BAY TREES PK 18AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam DeQuadros vs Toni Li1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Sonia Barnoff
published
3.70
Relura Horton
published
3.51
Miriam DeQuadros
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.39
Pia Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Shelley Lober
published
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.31
Jill Pfeiffer
published
3.28
Emily Amott
published 3.5
3.18
Robyn Weiss
published
3.16
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.15
Cindy Raykiewicz
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
Kari Mamizuka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Raykiewicz + Dana Kruger134 matchesnot enough data
Jill Pfeiffer + Dana Kruger213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Kruger + Emily Amott033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonia Barnoff
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Relura Horton
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pia Moore
67W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
Jill Pfeiffer
44W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Emily Amott
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
Robyn Weiss
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cindy Raykiewicz
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Kari Mamizuka
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.