Teams

White-Miller/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-04vs Wilson/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatty Vanvalkinburgh / Edith Calhoun vs Angie Cowart / Heather Tuttle1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Ashton / Mary Phillips vs Betty Andersen / Jana Henson6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCielene Aleksejus / Ashley Sorrow vs Janet Lawrence / Lynne Barkeloo6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-03vs Tigar/ChattanoogaLost 04
L#1 DoublesPatty Vanvalkinburgh / Caroline Ashton vs Courtney Andreach / Kimberly Rogg5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEdith Calhoun vs Leslie Simmons7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Phillips / Ashley Sorrow vs Marialice Hatch / Kymberly Restelli1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Miller / Cielene Aleksejus vs Jazan Powell / Charmaine Kincaid2-6, 2-6
2025-04-26vs Tigar/ChattanoogaLost 04
L#1 DoublesPatty Vanvalkinburgh / Sheila Jordan vs Marialice Hatch / Jessica Stamper1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVernice White vs Claire Mcvay3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Ashton / Mary Phillips vs Carol Tigar / Lori Cook0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCielene Aleksejus / Ginger Williams vs Courtney Andreach / Cheryl Johnson2-6, 1-6
2025-04-19vs Wilson/ChattanoogaLost 04
L#1 DoublesBeth Miller / Sheila Jordan vs Amy Weathers / Michelle Larson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVernice White vs Heather Tuttle0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Sorrow / Edith Calhoun vs Sarah Delay / Emily Bagley4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Miller / Caroline Ashton vs Janet Lawrence / Suzan House1-6, 0-6
2025-04-13vs Tigar/ChattanoogaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEdith Calhoun / Sheila Jordan vs Lori Cook / Kymberly Restelli6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCielene Aleksejus / Ashley Sorrow vs Jazan Powell / Courtney Andreach0-6, 0-6
2025-03-29vs Wilson/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 SinglesCaroline Ashton vs Heather Tuttle1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Phillips / Edith Calhoun vs Amy Weathers / Michelle Larson3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesVernice White / Cielene Aleksejus vs Jana Henson / Betsy Wilson0-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Caroline Ashton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Ashley Sorrow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Cielene Aleksejus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Vernice White
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Edith Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ginger Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Vanvalkinburgh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tatiana Dyskina
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Sorrow + Cielene Aleksejus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Ashton
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ashley Sorrow
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cielene Aleksejus
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Vernice White
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Edith Calhoun
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ginger Williams
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patty Vanvalkinburgh
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Jordan
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tatiana Dyskina
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.