Teams

Viera Regional Park - Newell

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-06vs Suntree - BeanLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Dahl / Maegan Hulscher vs Ann Passmore / Lori Ewing6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdie Newell / Stephanie ODonnell vs SARA BRESETTE / Christina Carver6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Naomi Coleman vs Marijane Forde / Amy Gregory4-6, 4-6
2025-09-29vs EFSC - SimmonsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaegan Hulscher / Peyton Shedrick vs Gaylyn Woodruff / Lisa LeDoux3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy McIntosh / Cheri McLachlan vs Anne Ramsey / Christina Kopp3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAstrid Johnson / Edie Newell vs Cynthia Simmons / Jennifer Thessen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-26vs EFSC - Kiss My AceWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy McIntosh / Cheri McLachlan vs Judy Beckler / Angela Miller6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Sandy Dahl vs Emily Criste / Keiko Edwards7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLicci Barham / Peyton Shedrick vs Amanda Burns / Karen Cornthwaite4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-22vs RCCB - RosenquistWon 21
L#1 DoublesEdie Newell / Astrid Johnson vs Melissa Anderson / Melissa Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMonica Hammer / Stephanie ODonnell vs Gisela Alcalde / Terry Taylor6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPeyton Shedrick / Licci Barham vs Lee Harrington / Heather Schleicher7-6, 6-3
2025-09-03vs Suntree - BeanLost 12
W#1 DoublesEdie Newell / Maegan Hulscher vs Sandra Rowe / Sharon Bean6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAstrid Johnson / Amy McIntosh vs Christina Carver / Ann Passmore6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Peyton Shedrick vs Amy Gregory / SARA BRESETTE5-7, 6-7
2025-08-18vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy McIntosh / Cheri McLachlan vs Jessica Shinn / Gabrielle Hebert3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Dahl / Licci Barham vs Stephanie Tran / Michelle Smith5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMonica Hammer / Stephanie ODonnell vs Lisa LeDoux / Gillian Dionne6-3, 6-4
2025-08-11vs RCCB - RosenquistLost 12
W#1 DoublesEdie Newell / Maegan Hulscher vs Sarah Hirji / Taylor Lutian6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Cheri McLachlan vs Gisela Alcalde / Andrea Swanson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Sandy Dahl vs Heather Lawrence / Heather Schleicher4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-04vs EFSC - Kiss My AceWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandy Dahl / Stephanie ODonnell vs Emily Dwyer / Courtney Thomassen5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy McIntosh / Astrid Johnson vs Emily Criste / Amanda Burns6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPeyton Shedrick / Licci Barham vs Karen Cornthwaite / Jan Johnson6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Maegan Hulscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Stephanie ODonnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Astrid Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Licci Barham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Cheri McLachlan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Naomi Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Cuc Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Edie Newell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Sandy Dahl
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy McIntosh
published 3.5
Monica Hammer
published
Peyton Shedrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maegan Hulscher + Stephanie ODonnell7461% games+5.5% vs expected
Licci Barham + Naomi Coleman221454% games+2.0% vs expected
Naomi Coleman + Sandy Dahl9652% games+2.0% vs expected
Naomi Coleman + Stephanie ODonnell5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Astrid Johnson + Cheri McLachlan8461% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Dahl + Edie Newell2446% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Johnson + Licci Barham5064% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Johnson + Naomi Coleman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maegan Hulscher
139W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Stephanie ODonnell
50W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Astrid Johnson
94W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Licci Barham
130W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cheri McLachlan
158W–138L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Naomi Coleman
169W–144L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cuc Nguyen
110W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Edie Newell
160W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Sandy Dahl
209W–133L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amy McIntosh
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Monica Hammer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peyton Shedrick
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.