Teams

Jen

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-07vs ChallengersWon 31
L#1 DoublesCynthia Henie / Kathy McArthur vs Susan Brunner / Barbara Jacobs4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesConita Mullett vs Lori Kaltenbach6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSong Bliss / Kathryn Spils vs Joaquita Martin / Bonnie Wickham6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Duclos / Rosemarie Rotunno vs Karen Savage / Sandra Denton6-3, 7-5
2022-05-07vs ChallengersWon 40
W#1 DoublesCynthia Henie / Kathy McArthur vs Susan Brunner / Lori Kaltenbach1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Duclos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesConita Mullett / Rosemarie Rotunno vs Karen Savage / Sandra Denton6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSherry Sedwick / Song Bliss vs Joaquita Martin / Bonnie Wickham6-0, 6-0
2022-05-06vs ChallengersWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Henie / Kathy McArthur vs Barbara Jacobs / Bonnie Wickham6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Duclos / Sherry Sedwick vs Sandra Denton / Karen Savage6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSong Bliss / Conita Mullett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jen301051187
2Challengers0321328176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jennifer Duclos
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Cynthia Henie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Conita Mullett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.98
Sherry Sedwick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Rosemarie Rotunno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
2.76
Kathy McArthur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Song Bliss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Duclos + Sherry Sedwick10362% games+6.5% vs expected
Cynthia Henie + Song Bliss4261% games−3.3% vs expected
Kathy McArthur + Song Bliss0934% games−12.9% vs expected
Kathy McArthur + Cynthia Henie2350% gamesnot enough data
Conita Mullett + Cynthia Henie134 matchesnot enough data
Conita Mullett + Song Bliss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Duclos
76W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cynthia Henie
79W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Conita Mullett
83W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
Sherry Sedwick
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
0
Rosemarie Rotunno
25W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kathy McArthur
64W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Song Bliss
63W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.