Teams

Spin-derellas 18+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-06-15vs Segrist 18+Split 11
W#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Jennifer Nazaire6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Cecilia-Hien Phan vs Sandy Friedman / Sherin Shahegh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-11vs E-I-E-I-O 18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesLorra Baker / Jennifer Shepard vs Carmen Scurato / Debra MacDonald1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGENA CHUNG vs EnPing Wang6-3, 5-4
2022-06-02vs Sparks 18+Won 21
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Katie Young6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Flynn / Cecilia-Hien Phan vs Patricia Murphy / Marge Naviasky1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai vs Debbie Drown / Kim Steffen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-25vs Oaksmith 3.5 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesNa Yi / Bari Abensohn vs Rochelle Porter / Elisa Oaksmith6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai vs Gena Conron / Stephanie Ruskin6-1, 6-4
2022-05-21Won 20
W#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Jennifer Shepard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-17vs Ladies of the Net 18+ 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesRiti Gupta / Bari Abensohn vs Michelle Limeres / Alison Punsalan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Lee / GENA CHUNG vs Amy Champion / Shari Albert2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-11vs Net Assets 18+Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Flynn / Bari Abensohn vs Teresa Adams / Marian Boring7-6, 5-5
L#3 DoublesLorra Baker / Jennifer Shepard vs Mary Golden / Arlene Kitahara6-7, 3-6
2022-05-07vs Players Are Ready 18+Lost 13
L#1 DoublesRiti Gupta / Cecilia-Hien Phan vs Kara Jones / Erin Meehan6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Tina Halley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatcharavalai Lawhcharoen / Chanpen Teeranon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesGENA CHUNG vs Sarah Lawrence3-6, 2-6
2022-05-01vs Ladies Who Love 18+Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Angela Lee5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen vs Teresa Reefe / Kristin Ostlie4-6, 2-6
2022-04-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Irene Lemberos7-5, 6-1
2022-04-24vs Sets in the City 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen vs Christina Ravekes / Sorina Eftim3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Karin Davis6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLinda Tsai / Cecilia-Hien Phan vs Julie Snavely / Mihaela Pertea2-6, 0-6
2022-04-21vs Will Play for Chardonnay 18+Split 11
W#2 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Ann Conklin6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen vs Gail Poole-Vaughn / Corlyn Krinsky3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-11vs Courts In Session 18+Lost 12
L#1 SinglesBari Abensohn vs Jessica Dixon Laukzemis6-0, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Rachele Stines6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLorra Baker / Cecilia-Hien Phan vs Grace Gourdine / Nancy Brown1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrea Judd
published 4
3.74
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.74
Katie Tetrault
published 4
3.53
Na Yi
published 4
3.50
Bari Abensohn
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.38
Elena Holford
published 3.5
3.37
Linda Tsai
published
3.27
GENA CHUNG
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
Amy Flynn
published 3.5
2.74
Lorra Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Jennifer Shepard
published
2.59
Cecilia-Hien Phan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Tetrault + Na Yi8456% gamesnot enough data
Lorra Baker + Cecilia-Hien Phan1451% gamesnot enough data
Bari Abensohn + Na Yi314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Linda Tsai314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Judd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chanpen Teeranon
209W–208L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–98L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Na Yi
198W–103L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Bari Abensohn
96W–87L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Elena Holford
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Linda Tsai
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–132L career · 14 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Flynn
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Lorra Baker
102W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Jennifer Shepard
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · 10 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.