Teams

KAllen/KRichards (Raintree)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs SGrindle (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Kathleen O'Donnell6-7, 4-6
2023-04-24vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKatrina Richards / Shelby Stahl vs Rebecca Cooper / Marion Mande2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Alyson Sunden vs Paula Moss / Sheila Passenant6-4, 6-3
2023-04-17vs DdeArmas (Firethorne)Split 11
W#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Katrina Richards vs Breck Lindley / Patty Swan6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Lee Steadman vs Danielle Shealy / Kathy Sawrey6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-03vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyson Sunden / Lesley Quick vs Kristin Heidkamp / Joan Bullard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Christine Leavitt0-6, 3-6
2023-03-27vs JJohnson/MDwyer (Carmel)Won 20
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Rachel Hallsten vs Kathryn Klaus / Jennifer Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHilda Austin / Katrina Richards vs Julia Hartley / Sara Porrata7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-13vs CMiles (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesLee Steadman / Katrina Richards vs Ramonette Belen / Karen Morgan1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlyson Sunden vs Christine Miles6-1, 7-5
2023-03-06vs SGrindle (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Rachel Hallsten vs Rubina Batt / Anita Corum3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatrina Richards / Shelby Stahl vs AMY SAFIR / Jean Lee Pirkey6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-27vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Alyson Sunden vs Dawn Tenev / Rebecca Cooper4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLesley Quick vs Sheila Passenant5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Katrina Richards
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #1 Singles 15% · published 3.5
3.34
Alyson Sunden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Shelby Stahl
published
3.32
Lesley Quick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Renee Ziemianski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Staci Wittek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Hilda Austin
published
2.94
Erin Moser
published
2.73
Denise Dexter
published 3
2.69
Nicole Love
published
2.66
Lee Steadman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Rachel Hallsten
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Quick + Alyson Sunden5357% games+10.6% vs expected
Lesley Quick + Katrina Richards261258% games+4.8% vs expected
Alyson Sunden + Katrina Richards7453% games−8.0% vs expected
Staci Wittek + Alyson Sunden3450% gamesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Katrina Richards3445% gamesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Lee Steadman4166% gamesnot enough data
Katrina Richards + Lee Steadman134 matchesnot enough data
Renee Ziemianski + Alyson Sunden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katrina Richards
150W–79L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Alyson Sunden
75W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Shelby Stahl
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Lesley Quick
83W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Renee Ziemianski
16W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Staci Wittek
97W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Hilda Austin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Erin Moser
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
2.94
3
Denise Dexter
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Nicole Love
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Lee Steadman
33W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.