Teams

Moore/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Women 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 2.70 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-01vs Tasker/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesKelly Richardson Dahlgren / Sarah Holtgrewe vs Tanya Myers / Ami Tasker0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAngie Moore vs Nancy Chandrasekaran2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKrista York / Jenny Harmeier vs Allison Ewing / Michele Thomas2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAngela Finerson vs Sally Gillum0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesToni Carmichael / Amanda Scott vs Leigh Ann Howell / Lilly Saint4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-24vs Turner/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesSarah Holtgrewe / Amanda Scott vs Rachel Young / Susannah Mays6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAshley Elder vs Emily Weller6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngie Moore / Catherine Brimhall vs Sarah Reed / Jenay Boggs6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTatiana de la Barrera vs Callie Mejia1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngela Finerson / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Julia McDonald / Anna Avant4-6, 4-6
2025-04-15vs Stolnicki/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmanda Scott / Allison McCool vs Lisa McIntosh / Shawnelle Davis4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAngela Finerson vs Tammy Smalley2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTatiana de la Barrera / Krista York vs Shena Cothran / Laura Berkenstock2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAngie Moore vs Lynn Henderson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Elder / Jenny Harmeier vs Carrie Ybos / Gail Gray5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Carpenter/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesAshley Elder / Jenny Harmeier vs Jenny Duncan / Micaela Cignetti3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Finerson vs Katherine Slater1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGena Brimhall / Amanda Scott vs Alissa Anthony / Stephanie Bailey2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAllison McCool vs Kimberly Hester2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKrista York / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Brie Brolin / Sara Albanese0-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs Tasker/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesAshley Elder / Jenny Harmeier vs Ami Tasker / Tanya Myers4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Brimhall vs Nancy Chandrasekaran2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAllison McCool / Amanda Scott vs Sally Gillum / Leigh Ann Howell3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAngie Moore vs Hallie Bauer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTatiana de la Barrera / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Caitlyn Arkwright / Andrea Harano1-6, 1-6
2025-03-25vs Turner/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmanda Scott / Angie Moore vs Natalie Meagle / Kaci Turner6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Brimhall vs Diana Phillips6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenny Harmeier / Sarah Holtgrewe vs Emily Weller / Rachel Young6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTatiana de la Barrera vs Anna Avant6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Elder / Kelly Richardson Dahlgren vs Mary Marshall Fenton / Susannah Mays6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Gena Brimhall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Sarah Holtgrewe
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.61
Angie Moore
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.56
Ashley Elder
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Allison McCool
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.50
Jenny Harmeier
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.37
Catherine Brimhall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Krista York
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.21
Angela Finerson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.17
Kelly Richardson Dahlgren
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.05
Toni Carmichael
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tatiana de la Barrera
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Harmeier + Angie Moore3445% games−0.9% vs expected
Toni Carmichael + Angie Moore1438% games−4.5% vs expected
Jenny Harmeier + Ashley Elder044 matchesnot enough data
Toni Carmichael + Kelly Richardson Dahlgren033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gena Brimhall
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Sarah Holtgrewe
11W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Angie Moore
13W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Ashley Elder
11W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
2.5
Allison McCool
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%41%59%
2.53
Jenny Harmeier
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Catherine Brimhall
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Krista York
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
2.5
Angela Finerson
12W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Kelly Richardson Dahlgren
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Toni Carmichael
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Tatiana de la Barrera
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.