Teams

Smouni/LR/PVCC

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-25vs Wilson/Weldon/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Conklin / Vivek Yadala vs Patrick Szeto / Rohan Raj Bandaru6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Yant / Jason Bennett vs Uday Akkaraju / Christopher Irons4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesReid Belew / Dustin Green vs Dean Worley / Craig Lair1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Adam Raines
published 4
3.76
Benjamin Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Jared Compton
published
3.52
Jason Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Scott Yant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Bradley McColey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
MacKenzie Barnes
published
3.00
William Kalkbrenner
published
2.99
Andrew Adkins
published 3
2.80
Hatim Smouni
published
Dustin Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Reid Belew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vivek Yadala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Raines
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Benjamin Conklin
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Jared Compton
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Jason Bennett
35W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
Scott Yant
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Bradley McColey
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
MacKenzie Barnes
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
William Kalkbrenner
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Andrew Adkins
35W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Hatim Smouni
14W–25L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Dustin Green
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Reid Belew
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vivek Yadala
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.