Teams

Tretsven/Cammack Winter 2024

2024 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 8.0 MX (SUN)

18 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-25vs Chase/EdwardsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtland Farrell / Tina Mcalpine vs Anh Doan / Lisa Rounds3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-28vs Kuberski 8.0 MXD (Winter 24)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Jonathan Riermann vs Megan Bradley / Matthew McCann4-6, 2-6
2024-01-07vs Rudser/Yee Winter-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesCourtland Farrell / Tina Mcalpine vs Sara DeSanto / Stephen Huck3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Julie Opfer
published
4.12
Doug Roseth
published
4.11
Paul Kolenich
published
4.08
Patrice Meger
published
4.01
Courtland Farrell
published 4.5
3.99
Carol Wahlstrand
published 4.5
3.96
Kristopher Birch
published
3.90
Amy Larsen
published 4
3.78
Anne Cammack
published 4
3.76
Jonathan Riermann
published
3.70
Tina Mcalpine
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.68
Christine Leach
published 4
3.42
Carol Forsythe
published 3.5
3.31
Caryn Myhre
published 3.5
3.19
Ann Gabrielli
published 3.5
Nathan Tretsven
published
Tom Hipkins
published
Tom Pfenning
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Cammack + Nathan Tretsven123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Opfer
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Doug Roseth
31W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Paul Kolenich
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.11
Patrice Meger
27W–25L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Courtland Farrell
22W–15L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Carol Wahlstrand
29W–39L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
Kristopher Birch
37W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Amy Larsen
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Anne Cammack
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Jonathan Riermann
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Tina Mcalpine
95W–72L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christine Leach
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Carol Forsythe
29W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Caryn Myhre
6W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Ann Gabrielli
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Nathan Tretsven
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Hipkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Pfenning
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.