Teams

FHaselden (Palisades CC)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-26vs TMagee/LDiman (Carmel CC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Lisa Strump vs Julia Hartley / Sara Porrata6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-29vs KLee (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Strump / Nataliya Rubanenko vs Jane Moncayo / Marjorie Wagner6-1, 6-1
2022-03-22vs JCarney (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Strump / Nataliya Rubanenko vs Mindy Zimmerman / Stacy Andrews6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-14vs MJessee/JBarton (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Lisa Strump vs Jena Barton / Deepti Dua6-4, 6-4
2022-03-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Strump vs Karen Allen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Nataliya Rubanenko
published
3.06
Lisa Strump
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.00
2.71
Lisa Gregoire
published
2.70
Angela Majewski
published 3
2.60
Joanne Ward
published
2.58
Laura Hatfield
published
2.40
Freida Haselden
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nataliya Rubanenko + Lisa Strump8453% games+1.8% vs expected
Freida Haselden + Joanne Ward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nataliya Rubanenko
43W–33L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Lisa Strump
33W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Annie Shook-Maier
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lisa Gregoire
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Angela Majewski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Joanne Ward
4W–19L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Laura Hatfield
30W–37L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Freida Haselden
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.