Teams

HPence (PLCC)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Mon PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-03vs JJones (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCJ ONeill / Sam Basden vs Adam Webb / David Greer2-6, 4-6
2022-09-26vs JDichak (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSam Basden / Howard Pence vs Alberto Botero / Frank Grindle0-6, 1-6
2022-09-19vs GJones (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelvin Day / Marc Swann vs Gray Jones / Aaron Willis6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-12vs RWilliamson (JCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSam Basden / Ryan Becker vs Steve Lepow / Daniel Wielunski2-6, 1-6
2022-09-08vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMarc Swann / Kelvin Day vs Daniel Holden / Gale Haruta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCJ ONeill / Sam Basden vs Mark Russo / Matthew Hembree2-6, 3-6
2022-08-29vs AHunt (Matthews Tennis)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelvin Day / Marc Swann vs Jim Bailer / Joe Glass6-3, 6-4
2022-08-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSam Basden / Brett Basden vs Austin Grabowski / Steven Johnson1-6, 1-6
2022-08-15vs JJones (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSam Basden / Donald VanCott vs Nate Siens / David Greer1-6, 1-6
2022-08-08vs JDichak (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelvin Day / Marc Swann vs Ron Dock / Joseph Dichak4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
CJ ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Donald VanCott
published 3.5
3.08
Marc Swann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Howard Pence
published 3.5
2.81
Wayne Burgamy
published
2.80
Rick Nicholson
published
2.60
Sam Basden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Anthony Licata
published
Keith Hargis
published
Kelvin Day
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Swann + Sam Basden2629% gamesnot enough data
Marc Swann + Howard Pence134 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Burgamy + Sam Basden033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
CJ ONeill
67W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Donald VanCott
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Marc Swann
28W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Howard Pence
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Wayne Burgamy
2W–19L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
2.81
Rick Nicholson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Sam Basden
6W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Anthony Licata
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Hargis
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelvin Day
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.