Teams

BELVEDERE TC 40AW4.0A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
3.80
3.78
Julie Flaherty
published
Beth Roy Jenkyn
published 4
3.70
Penelope Luce
published
3.69
Laura Zhang
published
3.65
Lisa Faber
published
3.65
Kate Ripple
published
3.60
Paige Meuse
published
3.59
Sara Byrne
published
3.51
Jennifer Hocking
published
3.48
Jessica Kaludis
published
3.47
Patricia Sheedy
published
3.35
Annabelle Frankl
published 3.5
3.33
Kathryn Benson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Kaludis + Annabelle Frankl3254% games−0.0% vs expected
Jennifer Hocking + Lisa Faber2345% games−1.3% vs expected
Lisa Faber + Julie Flaherty3258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Chamberlain
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4
Christy Wasserman
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Julie Flaherty
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Beth Roy Jenkyn
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Penelope Luce
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Laura Zhang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Lisa Faber
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Kate Ripple
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Paige Meuse
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Sara Byrne
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Hocking
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jessica Kaludis
18W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Patricia Sheedy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Annabelle Frankl
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Kathryn Benson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.