Teams

Mitchell/META

2026 Adult 55 & Over-META · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-25vs Zhang55/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Miller / Janet Mitchell vs Mary Warner / Analida Alexay6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDusty Blackburn / Mary DiSantis vs Sandra Cook / Carol Rossa6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKris Gompert / Lynn Johnson vs Alice Zhang / Marcy Walker6-3, 6-3
2026-04-11vs Zhang55/METASplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary DiSantis / Barbara Miller vs Heather Sanders / Donna Morris6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTaihi Egres / Janet Mitchell vs Carol Rossa / Mary Warner6-7, 2-6
2026-04-02vs Zhang55/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary DiSantis / Dusty Blackburn vs Analida Alexay / Alice Zhang6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsay McNabb / Taihi Egres vs Donna Morris / Marcy Walker6-2, 6-4
2026-03-16vs Zhang55/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllan Kitzmiller / Taihi Egres vs Heather Sanders / Analida Alexay6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Mitchell / Lindsay McNabb vs Alice Zhang / Donna Morris1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Caveney / Mary DiSantis vs Sandra Cook / Mary Warner6-3, 6-1
2026-03-14vs Zhang55/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynn Johnson / Emily Caveney vs Alice Zhang / Analida Alexay6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Mitchell / Mary DiSantis vs Donna Morris / Marcy Walker7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTaihi Egres / Ellan Kitzmiller vs Heather Sanders / Sandra Cook6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Emily Caveney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Kris Gompert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Ellan Kitzmiller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Dusty Blackburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Taihi Egres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Mary DiSantis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Lindsay McNabb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Janet Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary DiSantis + Dusty Blackburn4262% games+1.3% vs expected
Mary DiSantis + Emily Caveney6159% gamesnot enough data
Mary DiSantis + Taihi Egres4247% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay McNabb + Ellan Kitzmiller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Caveney
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
Kris Gompert
25W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Ellan Kitzmiller
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Dusty Blackburn
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Taihi Egres
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
Mary DiSantis
29W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Lindsay McNabb
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Janet Mitchell
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.