Teams

LTFC RED

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME

5 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-21vs CACI BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheila Salyers / Charity Aslin vs Tammy Holder / Jean Coates4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Baker / Judy Mickelson vs Kit Levoy / Melissa Cabeceiras6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-14vs SS-HP GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharity Aslin / Bonnie Baker vs Brooke Wagner / Susan OBrien1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSheila Salyers / Judy Mickelson vs Cherie Mitchell / Karen Keehan Odendahl6-1, 7-6
2023-06-07vs HRCA-N REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Mickelson / Kim Lyons vs Meghan Page / Kristen Swenson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Baker / Sheila Salyers vs Cynthia Clifford / Kelly Crawley1-6, 1-6
2023-05-31vs KC-RH REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBonnie Baker / Charity Aslin vs Gina Akins / Christie Mann2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Silverman / Judy Mickelson vs Maria Fischer / Lori Goulding5-7, 4-6
2023-05-24vs WC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Mickelson / Kim Lyons vs Tina Burton / MaryBeth Doerr6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAmy Silverman / Sheila Salyers vs Kathryn Cullen / Laura Ream6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCharity Aslin / Sheila Baker vs Becca Rinn / Taryn Wilson0-6, 4-6
2023-05-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesBonnie Baker / Sheila Salyers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-10vs KNO GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheila Salyers / Amy Silverman vs Cathy Nowak / Nancy Hogue6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Lyons / Judy Mickelson vs Jacqueline Schultz / Shelley Maloney6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBonnie Baker / Charity Aslin vs Julie Madden / Lori Roach7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Charity Aslin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Sheila Salyers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Judy Mickelson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Sheila Baker
published
Kim Lyons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Mickelson + Sheila Salyers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charity Aslin
82W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Sheila Salyers
92W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Judy Mickelson
35W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
Sheila Baker
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kim Lyons
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.