Teams

TCSP-Fuzzy Balls-Green

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-07vs PL-Aces and Lobs-NayakLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Frockt / Ben Perkowski vs Vishwanath Nayak / Joseph Polito2-6, 1-6
W#1 Singlesshumit vatsal vs SANCHIT AGARWAL6-7, 3-1
L#2 DoublesJan Dequit / Stephen Rising vs Rajesh Gatti / Amit Wadhwa0-6, 3-6
2026-02-23vs BC-Camara/BuchananLost 03
L#1 DoublesJan Dequit / Ben Perkowski vs Alfred Yu / Kwang Kim3-6, 0-6
L#1 Singlesshumit vatsal vs Jason Buchanan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Rising / Michael Green vs Andres Villaveces / Adam Holt2-6, 1-6
2026-02-21vs CP-The Afterprty A40+2026-GravesLost 04
L#1 DoublesBen Perkowski / Stephen Rising vs Bill Skilton / Walt Paulson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBen Amsel vs Joe van Zyl1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaurent Bellange / Matt Busch vs Kristen Grobstok / Michael Ensing2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Green / David Frockt vs Rich Choi / Jim Muenz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-13vs STC-Hipps/KosloffLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatt Busch / Laurent Bellange vs Duff Bryant / Jeff Feinstein1-6, 6-7
W#1 Singlesshumit vatsal vs Len Jordan7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Frockt / Ben Amsel vs David Kosloff / Mark de Vere White0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBen Perkowski / Michael Green vs Jeremy Blanchfield / Kirk Koenigsbauer6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs MC-3.5 Wolfpack-HinojosaLost 03
L#1 Doublesshumit vatsal / Ben Perkowski vs Tipu Qureshi / Terry Ward1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJan Dequit vs Danny Hinojosa2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Green / David Frockt vs Jeffrey Ng / Russel Hercules3-6, 1-6
2026-01-31vs PSC-Avengers-KancherlaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMatt Busch / Michael Green vs Yue Zhao / Zhidong Yang3-6, 3-6
W#1 Singlesshumit vatsal vs Jiaofeng Xu6-3, 5-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Lee / Jan Dequit vs Warren Yasutake / Suman Sadanand Narambrath3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Rising / Spencer Dillard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-01-25vs MI-Top Gun Aces 2026-ChenLost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid Frockt / Samuel Ostroff vs Alexis Falicov / Mien Chi Chen1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Green vs Subu Sankara Subramanian0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSpencer Dillard / Jan Dequit vs Hector Acosta / Kevin Boller3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBen Perkowski / Joshua Lee vs Jonathan Winny / Madan Ankapura3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-18vs BETC-Cover Your Alley-HsuLost 13
L#1 DoublesSpencer Dillard / Ben Perkowski vs Victor Cao / Fei Cheng6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSamuel Ostroff vs Gabriel Perez5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Dequit / David Frockt vs Roy Higashi / Steven Erickson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBen Amsel / Joshua Lee vs Bong SantoDomingo / Jenson Wu6-1, 6-4
2026-01-11vs AYTC-Vashon Islanders-GullinoWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoshua Lee / Matt Busch vs David Gullino / Joshua Batchelder6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSpencer Dillard vs Hargo Khurana1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJan Dequit / David Frockt vs David Dempster / Mark Richards6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Green / shumit vatsal vs John MacLean / Eli Stahl5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Matt Busch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Joshua Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
shumit vatsal
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.08
David Frockt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Jan Dequit
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.03
Ben Perkowski
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.98
Ben Amsel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Spencer Dillard
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Laurent Bellange
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Michael Green
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Ben Andrews
published 3
2.53
Stephen Rising
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jerrod Patterson
published
Samuel Ostroff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Matt Busch
5W–13L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Joshua Lee
71W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
shumit vatsal
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
David Frockt
4W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Jan Dequit
1W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Ben Perkowski
0W–10L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Ben Amsel
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Spencer Dillard
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Laurent Bellange
6W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Michael Green
8W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ben Andrews
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Stephen Rising
8W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jerrod Patterson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Ostroff
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.