Teams

Curran/Nashville

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs Schafer/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSpartacus Crawford / Charles Hawkins vs Michael McKeown / Daniel Schafer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEvan Curran / Jason Snap vs Jon Gugala / Eric Kimmerling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Hughes / Luke Krehbiel vs Jon Naglieri / Giovanni Santos7-5, 6-2
2026-07-15vs Schafer/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSpartacus Crawford / Connor Malchow vs Michael McKeown / Daniel Schafer3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEvan Curran / Brandon Dixon vs Bailey Gill / Jon Gugala6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Ellsworth / Joe Tatum vs Matt Cole / Nicholas Yglesias0-6, 3-6
2026-06-27vs Schafer/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Faldetta / Jason Snap vs Daniel Schafer / Lance Watson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEvan Curran / Mark Hammond vs Bailey Gill / Drake Watson3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Ellsworth / Brandon Keane vs Blake Neeley / Nicholas Yglesias6-2, 6-4
2026-06-20vs Schafer/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandon Dixon / John Faldetta vs Michael McKeown / Daniel Schafer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Hammond / Jason Snap vs Bailey Gill / Eric Kimmerling6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Hughes / Luke Krehbiel vs Matt Cole / Blake Neeley7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-13vs Schafer/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnor Malchow / Randy Kerr vs Drake Watson / Lance Watson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Hammond / Evan Curran vs Tyler Estes / Jon Gugala6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Ellsworth / Michael Hughes vs Giovanni Santos / Nicholas Yglesias4-6, 4-6
2026-06-06vs Schafer/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharles Hawkins / Spartacus Crawford vs Daniel Schafer / Michael McKeown6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrandon Dixon / Jason Snap vs Eric Kimmerling / Tyler Estes6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoe Tatum / Luke Krehbiel vs Blake Neeley / Jon Naglieri3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Connor Malchow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Charles Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Spartacus Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
John Faldetta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Randy Kerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Brandon Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Jason Snap
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Evan Curran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Luke Krehbiel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
John Piovarcy
published
3.54
Michael Ellsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brandon Keane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joe Tatum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Dixon + John Piovarcy134 matchesnot enough data
John Piovarcy + Jason Snap224 matchesnot enough data
Spartacus Crawford + Connor Malchow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Malchow
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Charles Hawkins
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Spartacus Crawford
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
John Faldetta
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Randy Kerr
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Brandon Dixon
11W–11L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
Jason Snap
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
Evan Curran
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Luke Krehbiel
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.72
John Piovarcy
13W–14L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Michael Ellsworth
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Brandon Keane
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joe Tatum
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.