Teams

Chata/Sonya Brown

2025 CHATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '24 · Women 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs Chata/Traviera SewellLost 13
L#1 DoublesWhitney Glisson / Ellie Howard vs Traviera Sewell / Mamie Crawford6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSeonhee Song / Laura Daniel vs Rose Rockecharlie / Lesley McInvale6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Lynn Childress / Kate Updegrove vs Kimberly Davison / Connie Hensler6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesSara Morman / Allison Bradford vs Sarah Beth Childress / Grace Hensler0-6, 0-6
2024-10-06vs Chata/Traviera SewellLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Bradford / MacKenzie Rogers vs Rose Rockecharlie / Kimberly Davison0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Lynn Childress / Whitney Glisson vs Ashley Anderson / Maurie White7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAna Niknejad / Catherine Holmes vs Traviera Sewell / Elizabeth Willimon4-6, 1-6
2024-09-29vs Chata/Traviera SewellSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Lynn Childress / Kate Updegrove vs Traviera Sewell / Yuyoung Cha4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEllie Howard / Yeeun Jen vs Sarah Beth Childress / Mamie Crawford6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAna Niknejad / Allison Bradford vs Elizabeth Willimon / Hyunsuk Lee3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesCatherine Holmes / Seonhee Song vs Connie Hensler / Lizzie Simpson7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Kate Updegrove
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Traviera Sewell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Seonhee Song
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Ellie Howard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Yeeun Jen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Ana Niknejad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Catherine Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.15
Mary Lynn Childress
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Whitney Glisson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.87
MacKenzie Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Morman
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Updegrove
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Traviera Sewell
30W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Seonhee Song
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.61
Ellie Howard
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Yeeun Jen
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37
2.5
Ana Niknejad
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Catherine Holmes
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Mary Lynn Childress
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Whitney Glisson
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
MacKenzie Rogers
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Sara Morman
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.