Teams

Lewis/55/7.5/CWN/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women · 7.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 13 2:00 PM
Southern Hills Tennis Center
Sep 20 2:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 27 2:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 4 2:00 PM
Southern Hills Tennis Center
Oct 11 2:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 18 2:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
2026-08-22vs Cummer/55/7.5/CWN/QTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Easterling / Robin Harris vs Judy Tabor / Patricia Hurst6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Spano / Carol Mixon vs Debra Richardson / Samantha Bruscato3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Lewis / Cindy Riley vs Cheryl Upchurch / Glenda Marsh5-7, 1-6
2026-08-15vs Bihm/55/7.5/CWN/SHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Brown / Maude MacK vs Lora Slack / Karen Sibert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Lewis / Cindy Riley vs Denise Gordon / Gina Bihm2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Harris / Laquita Briggs vs Katy Vincent / Nong Boutaloth0-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rubben/55/7.5/CWN/QTC1030016
2Lewis/55/7.5/CWN/POTC1021430
3Bihm/55/7.5/CWN/SHTC0112420
4Cummer/55/7.5/CWN/QTC0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Maude MacK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Cindy Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Diane Cord
published 4
3.36
Karen Easterling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Kendra Wagnon
published
3.21
Robin Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Alison Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Laquita Briggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Becky Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Julie Spano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Sallie Walker
published
3.12
Carol Mixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Ann Leonard
published 3.5
3.06
Terri Bianca
published
Jenny Hardison
published
Karen Tyler
published
Suzanne Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Harris + Laquita Briggs5549% games+3.8% vs expected
Becky Brown + Kendra Wagnon4352% games+3.6% vs expected
Kendra Wagnon + Terri Bianca1449% games+0.0% vs expected
Julie Spano + Terri Bianca7653% games−0.7% vs expected
Becky Brown + Laquita Briggs1440% games−8.7% vs expected
Ann Leonard + Becky Brown2352% gamesnot enough data
Becky Brown + Alison Byrd213 matchesnot enough data
Kendra Wagnon + Laquita Briggs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maude MacK
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cindy Riley
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Diane Cord
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Karen Easterling
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.36
Kendra Wagnon
17W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Robin Harris
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Alison Byrd
8W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Laquita Briggs
15W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Becky Brown
14W–19L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Julie Spano
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Sallie Walker
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carol Mixon
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Leonard
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Terri Bianca
16W–28L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jenny Hardison
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Tyler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Lewis
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.