Teams

Hills/Giang

2022 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-21vs HCC Racq Pacq- Abrams/MeansWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoAnn Lind / Trisha Shirkey vs Wenhong Li / Ronghui You6-2, 4-3
2022-08-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesLara Slatniske / Michelle Meyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-02vs TYCC Yachts of Shots - J. GarlickWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Myers / Elaine Aschenbrenner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLara Slatniske / Alice Hagan vs Tania Biller / Jennifer Garlick6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDeirdre West / Trisha Shirkey vs Christine Dietrich / Kathryn Thomas5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-09vs TYCC Yachts of Shots - J. GarlickWon 30
W#1 DoublesCassandra Remedios / Jennifer Myers vs Meagan Brandriff / Andria Owen6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Meyer / Lara Slatniske vs Alexis Ciesla / Melissa O'Connor6-0, 3-3
W#3 DoublesJoAnn Lind / Trisha Shirkey vs Tracy MacKechnie / Anne Kelley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Hagan
published 4.5
Asbel Giang
published 4.5
4.14
Olivia Rivas
published
4.12
4.12
Andrea Fajardo
published 4.5
3.91
Jennifer Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Lara Slatniske
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.65
Deirdre West
published 4
3.62
Michelle Meyer
published
3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.39
Trisha Shirkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Marie Bialousz
published
JoAnn Lind
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alice Hagan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olivia Rivas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Elaine Aschenbrenner
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Andrea Fajardo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
Jennifer Myers
60W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.91
4
Lara Slatniske
130W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Deirdre West
14W–29L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michelle Meyer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Trisha Shirkey
138W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Marie Bialousz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
JoAnn Lind
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.