Teams

Ka.Wakeford40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-16vs Ke.Townsend40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesJenna Dysart / Emily Hancock vs Laura Ross / Emily Starritt4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Zurawel / Celia Whited vs Julie Brigham / Kelly Townsend2-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs Yv.Barrow40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Santospago / Martha Zurawel vs Parker Wright / Jeanie White4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCelia Whited / Cristina Ennis vs Mary Beth Broyles / Alison Anderson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJenna Dysart / Karen Wakeford vs Julie Coyne / Amie Irby6-4, 6-2
2024-04-25vs Ka.Percy40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Cara Kuremsky vs Katherine Canavan / Stacey Giglio5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Callahan / Tina Santospago vs Rebekah Mcconnell / Kate Pirrung6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-12vs Ra.Mills40A3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Martha Zurawel vs Helen Harris / Kristen Wassel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTina Santospago / Brenda Coules vs Rachel Mills / Kelly Creekmore1-6, 3-6
2024-04-11vs Co.Shaw40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Cara Kuremsky vs Amanda Dawson / Debra Neville6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCristina Ennis / Celia Whited vs Teressa Paschaloudis / Luann Richardson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-21vs Bi.Trigilio40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Jenna Dysart vs Amanda Fish / Denise Decandia2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCristina Ennis / Celia Whited vs Bich Trigilio / Nicole Shaffer2-6, 1-6
2024-03-14vs Ke.Townsend40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMartha Zurawel / Kellie Chesson vs Kelly Townsend / Caroline Fungaroli6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCelia Whited / Cristina Ennis vs Aulia Tandradinata / Vanese Clough4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-07vs Yv.Barrow40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Cara Kuremsky vs Elizabeth Merritt / Alison Uthe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenna Dysart / Karen Wakeford vs Shade Maret / Lee Veit6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Beth Rives
published 3.5
Celia Whited
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cristina Ennis
published 3.5
3.22
Jenna Dysart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.07
Kellie Chesson
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.99
Karen Wakeford
published
2.74
Jennifer Bissette
published
2.73
Tina Santospago
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Chesson + Jenna Dysart6747% games+12.2% vs expected
Celia Whited + Kellie Chesson7356% gamesnot enough data
Tina Santospago + Kellie Chesson0536% gamesnot enough data
Celia Whited + Jenna Dysart213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Rives
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cristina Ennis
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jenna Dysart
98W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 11 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jennifer Bissette
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Tina Santospago
51W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.