Teams

CCRC-Nikhil (Mixed 3.5)

2025 CSRATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Summer '25 · Mixed 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-21vs CSRATA/Danielle DavidsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Shimp / Karen Fulton vs Blake Elam / Kelsey Cannady0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFain Dye / Nadine Brendza vs Mark Coleman / Rachel Stephens1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNikhil Narendran / Susan Trammell vs Freta Trotty / Shiquan Brown6-7, 0-6
2025-07-14vs West Lake RumbaughWon 21
L#1 DoublesTom Shimp / Susan Trammell vs Dileep Kondur / Kelly Homlar6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFain Dye / Karen Fulton vs Vishal Arora / Eliza Myers6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNikhil Narendran / Angela Magnuson vs John Whitwell / Michele Rumbaugh7-5, 7-6
2025-07-07vs CCRC/DashiellLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Adamski / Craig Adamski vs Ellie Dashiell / Cory Muncill1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Queen / Susan Trammell vs David Hartmann / MacEy Miller2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTony Kramer / Angela Magnuson vs Laurel Landon / Eddie Miranda6-1, 6-1
2025-06-18vs Mt. Vintage - BellWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Fulton / Fain Dye vs Caleb Bell / Jessica Weir4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Olsen-Tank / Sammy Crawford vs Laura Weir / Shawn Risher6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Trammell / Tony Kramer vs Lyndi Baldy / Michael Baldy6-0, 6-1
2025-06-16vs Mt. Vintage - BellWon 21
L#1 DoublesFain Dye / Nadine Brendza vs Tiffany Padgett / David Bell6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTony Kramer / Karen Fulton vs Analiese Bell / Caleb Bell7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCraig Adamski / Laura Adamski vs Amanda Mellon / Jeremy Lacey6-4, 6-1
2025-06-02vs CCRC/DashiellLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Queen / Kelly Mercier vs David Hartmann / Dara Dixon5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNikhil Narendran / Kathleen Olsen-Tank vs Hunter Reid / MacEy Miller6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSammy Crawford / Angela Magnuson vs Cory Muncill / Ellie Dashiell5-7, 0-6
2025-05-19vs CSRATA/Danielle DavidsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesTom Shimp / Nadine Brendza vs Kelsey Cannady / Blake Elam2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNikhil Narendran / Kelly Mercier vs Freta Trotty / Hyon Ko6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatthew Queen / Angela Magnuson vs Shiquan Brown / Rachel Stephens4-6, 3-6
2025-04-28vs West Lake RumbaughWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Trammell / Sammy Crawford vs John Whitwell / Becky Horner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Queen / Kelly Mercier vs Mickey Stapp / Shelley Hollan6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTom Shimp / Karen Fulton vs Michele Rumbaugh / Christopher Payne2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Susan Trammell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Angela Magnuson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.62
Kelly Mercier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Kathleen Olsen-Tank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Tom Shimp
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Nikhil Narendran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Tony Kramer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Matthew Queen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Karen Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Sammy Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Nadine Brendza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Laura Adamski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Fain Dye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Craig Adamski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Adamski + Craig Adamski4253% games+5.1% vs expected
Craig Adamski + Fain Dye5353% games−0.1% vs expected
Fain Dye + Nadine Brendza2339% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Trammell
72W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Angela Magnuson
81W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Kelly Mercier
54W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Kathleen Olsen-Tank
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Tom Shimp
37W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Nikhil Narendran
23W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Tony Kramer
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Matthew Queen
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Karen Fulton
35W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Sammy Crawford
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Nadine Brendza
24W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Laura Adamski
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Fain Dye
25W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Craig Adamski
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.