Teams

Berry-Santos/18/6.5/WCD/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 Shrev

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-14vs Mitchell-Cummer/18/6.5/WCD/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBailey Berry / Allison Santos vs Shayne Bryan / Kim McGuirt7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenny Rodgers / Kim Smith vs Lynette Campisi / Laquita Briggs6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristin McCoy / Brandi Hermes vs Brittany Mitchell / Karen McCoy6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Hardtner/18/6.5/WCD/ERCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Roberts / Jenny Rodgers vs Ting Liang / Emily Horne6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesValarie Thiels / Aubree Bunyard vs Jenifer Doege / Parisa Zamani6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristin McCoy / Brandi Hermes vs Carrie Rainey / Kelly Schmidt6-2, 6-2
2025-09-30vs Binderim/18/6.5/WCD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBailey Berry / Allison Santos vs Lynn Ferry-Nelson / Rachael Deere4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Rodgers / Kim Kitchens vs Lyndsey Chandler / Nicole Mazur6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesValarie Thiels / Julie Baranowski vs Jenifer Gordon / Lora Slack2-6, 3-6
2025-09-23vs Hooper/18/6.5/WCD/STCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrandi Hermes / Kristin McCoy vs Jocelyn Hooper / Mary Tipton3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAubree Bunyard / Elaine Gilbert vs Christie Cox / Ashley Price3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-09-16vs Gifford-Doughty/18/6.5/WCD/STCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesBailey Berry / Allison Santos vs Suzanne Patton / Stephanie Bass6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Kitchens / Kim Smith vs Julia Bryn / Kyla Fulco4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAubree Bunyard / Julie Baranowski vs Margaret Gifford / Laura Frierson4-6, 6-7
2025-09-09vs Mitchell-Cummer/18/6.5/WCD/POTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesValarie Thiels / Mary Ward vs Sapna Tank / Kimberly Arizmendi6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Baranowski / Elaine Gilbert vs Laquita Briggs / Madeline Cummer7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJenny Rodgers / Bailey Berry vs Julie Burgin / Shayne Bryan5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-05vs Hardtner/18/6.5/WCD/ERCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Floyd / Brandi Hermes vs Nikki Hanna / Amelia Chandler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Kitchens / Valarie Thiels vs Indira Sartin / Laretta Barrow3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenny Rodgers / Kristin McCoy vs Karen Hardtner / Kimberly Smith6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Binderim/18/6.5/WCD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBailey Berry / Kim Kitchens vs Ann Sellers / Meredith Gore0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Gilbert / Kim Smith vs Lyndsey Chandler / Betsy Sample2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesValarie Thiels / Brandi Hermes vs Jenifer Gordon / Jennifer Stelly2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Bailey Berry
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Mary Ward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kim Kitchens
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Jenny Rodgers
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.05
Elaine Gilbert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Valarie Thiels
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
Heather Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Julie Baranowski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Aubree Bunyard
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Kristin McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Brandi Hermes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Rodgers + Aubree Bunyard4256% games+7.3% vs expected
Valarie Thiels + Heather Floyd16658% games+5.2% vs expected
Mary Ward + Valarie Thiels12258% games+5.2% vs expected
Kristin McCoy + Brandi Hermes3743% games+4.7% vs expected
Brandi Hermes + Valarie Thiels134 matchesnot enough data
Valarie Thiels + Aubree Bunyard224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ward + Kristin McCoy303 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Rodgers + Kristin McCoy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bailey Berry
35W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Mary Ward
32W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kim Kitchens
19W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jenny Rodgers
71W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Elaine Gilbert
23W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Valarie Thiels
74W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Heather Floyd
59W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Julie Baranowski
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Aubree Bunyard
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Kristin McCoy
21W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brandi Hermes
15W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.