Teams

Philly Cricket

Adult Tri-Level League · Tri Level Men 3.5-4.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.58 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-19vs We Canh Do ItLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaulino Diaz / Richard Danze vs Canh Ho / Michael King0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Boyd / Sanford Monaghan vs Devin McBride / Daniel Taboada4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKeith Day / Baird Standish vs Sascha Kristian / John Obando3-6, 3-6
2024-10-14vs UMLY United 4.5 TriSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRichard Danze / Paulino Diaz vs Andy Chung / Aaron Palmer6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDavid Reuter / Chris Fralic vs Dennis Krijt / Quang Nguyen2-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs UMLY United 4.5 TriLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Boyd / Robert Donahue vs Mark Hazzard / Henrik Svensson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaulino Diaz / Sanford Monaghan vs Chris Powell / Markus Edstrom4-6, 0-6
2024-10-05vs PennypackerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Donahue / Robert Wainwright vs Craig Evans / Brandon Gabrys4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaulino Diaz / Kyle Eaton vs Todd Brown / Chris Jarman4-6, 3-6
2024-09-21vs We Canh Do ItLost 03
L#1 DoublesEvan Speece / Richard Danze vs Kai Czubryt-Ogino / Charles Triolo4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSanford Monaghan / Robert Donahue vs Russell Chamberlin / Matthew Peterson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Eaton / Alexander Miller vs Thomas J Giordano Jr / John Obando6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-14vs Great Volley 12.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Donahue / Robert Wainwright vs Pelle Duong / Allen Cheung4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlexander Miller / Sanford Monaghan vs Paolo Quimbo / Deepak Rajendran1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Reuter / Chris Fralic vs William Lam / Indrajeet Joglekar6-2, 6-1
2024-09-07vs Hoffman Park 12.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaulino Diaz / Robert Donahue vs Andrew Baker / Abhay Singh3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Boyd / Richard Danze vs Scott Kober / Hefei Liu4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlexander Miller / Kyle Eaton vs Chris Cappelli / Jason Solovitz6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri Level Men 3.5-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andres Blohm
published 4
David Boyd
published 4
3.60
Robert Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Alexander Miller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chris Fralic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Reuter
published 3.5
Baird Standish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Evan Speece
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Hassler
published
Keith Day
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paulino Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Danze
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Haimes
published
Robert Wainwright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sanford Monaghan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Flynn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paulino Diaz + Sanford Monaghan0630% games−1.9% vs expected
Robert Donahue + Robert Wainwright123 matchesnot enough data
Robert Haimes + Andres Blohm213 matchesnot enough data
Paulino Diaz + Richard Danze123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andres Blohm
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Boyd
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Donahue
55W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Alexander Miller
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chris Fralic
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Reuter
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Baird Standish
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Evan Speece
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
John Hassler
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Keith Day
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kyle Eaton
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paulino Diaz
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Danze
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Haimes
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Wainwright
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sanford Monaghan
0W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Flynn
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.