Teams

Staiert - Lifetime

2022 IA 40 & Over Adult League · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-18vs IA/Heil & Hanson/40&Over4.0MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKelly Watson / Brian Rickert vs Brent Hanson / Jeff Ditsworth1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Staiert vs Steven Harper7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Brick / Matthew Morgan vs Ronald Bradfield / Joel Sissel6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Baeth / Barron Bremner vs Tom Franklin / Bob Chleborad3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-12-10vs Blume & Buck - GenesisWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Brick / Matthew Morgan vs Travis Colson / Keith Buck6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRyan Staiert vs Daniel Pitz5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKevin Baeth vs Robert Marold6-2, 6-1
2021-11-20vs IA/Heil & Hanson/40&Over4.0MLost 05
L#1 DoublesCarlos Lavastida / Prakash Arumugam vs Tom Franklin / Douglas Smith4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoe Peterson vs David Hash5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Brick / Matthew Morgan vs Ricardo Leon Mayorga / Brent Hanson5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRyan Staiert vs Joel Sissel7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKevin Baeth / Barron Bremner vs Richard Heil / Ronald Bradfield3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-11-06vs Jha- GenesisLost 23
L#1 DoublesPrakash Arumugam / Ron Shortenhaus vs Stu Card / Ravindran Perumal1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJoe Peterson vs Peter Dennis Legaspi7-6, 3-3
L#2 DoublesKevin Baeth / David Brick vs Michael Bohnenkamp / Trushar Shukla3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRyan Staiert vs Stefano Vignati7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarlos Lavastida / Kelly Watson vs Scott Neely / Sudhish Madhavan2-6, 3-6
2021-10-09vs Blume & Buck - GenesisWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoe Peterson / Matthew Morgan vs Nick Stahly / James Smith6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKevin Baeth vs Robert Marold6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Watson / Barron Bremner vs Travis Colson / SARAVANAN KRISHNAN6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRyan Staiert vs Kiran Ummadi6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPrakash Arumugam / Andrew Manatt vs Todd Versteeg / Thomas Hayes7-5, 6-1
2021-09-25vs Jha- GenesisLost 23
L#1 DoublesDavid Brick / Ron Shortenhaus vs Anil Jha / Ravindran Perumal2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Staiert vs Scott Neely6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAndrew Manatt / Matthew Morgan vs Stefano Vignati / Stu Card2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Watson vs Peter Dennis Legaspi1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPrakash Arumugam / Joe Peterson vs John Micka / Jerry Lovejoy6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Heil & Hanson/40&Over4.0M5124619215
2Jha- Genesis51201025236
3Sichterman - NDAC4117821196
4Staiert - Lifetime24131738283
5Childers - QCTC1481739267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Ryan Staiert
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.79
Barron Bremner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carlos Lavastida
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Kevin Baeth
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
David Brick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Matthew Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Ron Shortenhaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Brian Rickert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Andrew Manatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joe Peterson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly Watson
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Prakash Arumugam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Brick + Ron Shortenhaus6260% games+5.4% vs expected
David Brick + Matthew Morgan3547% games+3.9% vs expected
Matthew Morgan + Barron Bremner5159% games+2.1% vs expected
David Brick + Ryan Staiert111052% games+1.0% vs expected
Ryan Staiert + Barron Bremner5352% games−0.1% vs expected
Ron Shortenhaus + Matthew Morgan3446% games−0.1% vs expected
Kevin Baeth + Barron Bremner3446% games−0.2% vs expected
Matthew Morgan + Kevin Baeth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ryan Staiert
83W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4
Barron Bremner
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Carlos Lavastida
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Baeth
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
David Brick
53W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Matthew Morgan
40W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Ron Shortenhaus
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brian Rickert
20W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Andrew Manatt
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Peterson
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Watson
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Prakash Arumugam
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.