Teams

4 acac Stephens Advance 8.0

2022 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-06vs 6 Dominion BalesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKarl Koenig / Jeff Bosch vs Nelson Dawson / Joseph Cappellino2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Naughton / Walter Norwood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-05vs 5 MRTC ThorntonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Jeff Richman vs James Gates / Jimmy Ghaphery6-4, 6-4
2022-07-27vs 3 Salisbury Riegel GeezersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Oosterhuis / Jeff Bosch vs Taylor Clarke / Whitley Day6-1, 6-1
2022-07-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Sipe / Sung Kang vs Brian Culley / Richard Clark6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-30vs 2 Westwood HighfillLost 01
L#1 DoublesSung Kang / William Stephens vs Richard Godsey / Frank Payne6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-23vs 7 Lakeside HowellWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Kim / Walter Norwood vs Andy Tucker / Tim Parks1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-16vs 5 MRTC ThorntonWon 10
W#2 DoublesWalter Norwood / Sung Kang vs Alexander Howlett / Fernando Andrews6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Sung Kang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Scott Kim
published
3.79
Jeff Bosch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Chris Naughton
published 4
3.67
Marc Oosterhuis
published
3.55
Jonathan Brew
published
3.50
Gary Reinhardt
published 4
3.42
Marc Elim
published
3.41
Karl Koenig
published
3.33
Jeff Richman
published
3.03
Walter Norwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Kim + Karl Koenig123 matchesnot enough data
Marc Oosterhuis + Chris Naughton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Scott Kim
4W–20L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Jeff Bosch
205W–177L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Chris Naughton
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Marc Oosterhuis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Jonathan Brew
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Gary Reinhardt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Marc Elim
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Karl Koenig
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jeff Richman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.33
Walter Norwood
100W–78L career · 8 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.